head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs datamodel-code-generator
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars, 6,225 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. datamodel-code-generator has 4,047 stars, 484 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 1,895% (80,724 vs 4,047 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; datamodel-code-generator is written in Python under MIT. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, datamodel-code-generator 12%. datamodel-code-generator was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (graphql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | datamodel-code-generator | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 81K | ★ 4.0K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.2K | ⑂ 484 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick datamodel-code-generator if
- You want the datamodel-code-generator feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and datamodel-code-generator fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch Open Source API Development Ecosystem Built with ❤︎ by contributors We highly recommend you take a look at the Hoppscotch Documentation to learn more about the app. Support Features ❤️ Lightweight: Crafted with minimalistic UI design. ⚡️ Fast: Send requests and get responses in real time. 🗄️ HTTP Methods: Request methods define the type of action you are requesting to be performed. GET Requests retrieve resource information POST The server creates a new entry in a database PUT Updates an existing resource PATCH Very similar to PUT but makes a partial update on a resource DELETE Deletes resource or…
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About datamodel-code-generator
datamodel code generator 🚀 Generate Python data models from schema definitions in seconds. 📚 Documentation · 🧪 Playground · 💼 Lead maintainer available for work [!NOTE] Playground privacy: Generation runs locally in your browser with Pyodide. Your schema and options are not sent to a backend. Shared repro URLs encode them in the URL fragment ( state=... ), which browsers do not send to the server; the full URL can still be stored in your browser history or wherever you share it. ✨ What it does Pick any one of the supported inputs and pick the Python model style you want as output. input model…
read the full datamodel-code-generator overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or datamodel-code-generator more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars and datamodel-code-generator has 4,047. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and datamodel-code-generator free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and datamodel-code-generator under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and datamodel-code-generator?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and datamodel-code-generator in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or datamodel-code-generator?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,724 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose datamodel-code-generator if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.