head to head · open source
gpt-load vs kiro-gateway
gpt-load has 7,199 GitHub stars, 798 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. kiro-gateway has 2,347 stars, 561 forks, 103 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. gpt-load leads on adoption by 207% (7,199 vs 2,347 stars). gpt-load is written in Go under MIT; kiro-gateway is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. gpt-load has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, kiro-gateway 24%. gpt-load was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (anthropic, api-gateway, claude, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| gpt-load | kiro-gateway | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 7.2K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-05-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 798 | ⑂ 561 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick gpt-load if
- You weight community size — 7.2K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick kiro-gateway if
- You want the kiro-gateway feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and kiro-gateway fits your workflow better
About gpt-load
GPT Load A self hosted AI gateway for multi channel, multi credential setups API keys, subscription accounts, traffic scheduling, failure handling, request logs, and usage accounting — behind a single entry point. English · 中文 · 日本語 Official Website Sponsors Become a sponsor Sponsor details (collapsible) OfoxAI: Text, image, and video AI in one platform OfoxAI is a unified AI API platform bringing together text, image, and video models from multiple providers. With OpenAI compatible endpoints and native Anthropic and Gemini interfaces, developers can access models for AI applications, agents, and content…
read the full gpt-load overview →
About kiro-gateway
👻 Kiro Gateway Proxy gateway for Kiro API (Amazon Q Developer / AWS CodeWhisperer) 🇬🇧 English • 🇷🇺 Русский • 🇨🇳 中文 • 🇪🇸 Español • 🇮🇩 Indonesia • 🇧🇷 Português • 🇯🇵 日本語 • 🇰🇷 한국어 Made with ❤️ by @Jwadow Use Claude models from Kiro with Claude Code, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Claw Code, Codex app, Cursor, Cline, Roo Code, Kilo Code, Obsidian, OpenAI SDK, LangChain, Continue and other OpenAI or Anthropic compatible tools Models • Features • Quick Start • Configuration • 💖 Sponsor 🤖 Available Models (Free List) ⚠️ Important: Model availability depends on your Kiro tier (free/paid). The gateway provides…
read the full kiro-gateway overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is gpt-load or kiro-gateway more popular?
gpt-load has 7,199 GitHub stars and kiro-gateway has 2,347. gpt-load has the larger community by that measure.
Are gpt-load and kiro-gateway free?
Both are open source. gpt-load is licensed under MIT and kiro-gateway under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between gpt-load and kiro-gateway?
gpt-load is written in Go and kiro-gateway in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, gpt-load or kiro-gateway?
Choose gpt-load if you want the larger community (7,199 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose kiro-gateway if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.