head to head · open source

glance vs MaterialAbout

glance has 37,086 GitHub stars, 1,463 forks, 318 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. MaterialAbout has 1,511 stars, 208 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. glance leads on adoption by 2,354% (37,086 vs 1,511 stars). glance is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; MaterialAbout is written in Java under MIT. glance has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, MaterialAbout 14%. glance was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

glance ★ 37K MaterialAbout ★ 1.5K category Community & Social

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

glance MaterialAbout
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 1.5K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go Java
Last push 2026-09-05 2026-03-03
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 208
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick glance if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full glance profile →

pick MaterialAbout if

  • You want the MaterialAbout feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and MaterialAbout fits your workflow better

full MaterialAbout profile →

About glance

Glance is a self hosted dashboard application written in Go and released under the AGPL 3.0 license. It gathers feeds and status information from many sources into a single customizable page, so that a user can read news, follow channels and watch server health from one interface instead of opening a separate tab or application for each source. It lives in the self hosted and homelab ecosystem, alongside other Docker packaged services that users run on their own hardware. The project has been on GitHub for about two years, holds roughly 37,000 stars and 1,454 forks, and its topic list places it among aggregators,…

read the full glance overview →

About MaterialAbout

MaterialAbout is an Android library written in Java and released under the MIT license. It provides a material design about screen for Android apps, combining a developer profile and application information. The project lives in the Android ecosystem and is intended for mobile developers.

read the full MaterialAbout overview →

More in Community & Social

Mastodon ★ 50K maigret ★ 38K Bluesky ★ 18K Lemmy ★ 15K giscus ★ 12K owncast ★ 12K

Related comparisons

mastodon vs glance maigret vs glance mastodon vs maigret mastodon vs bluesky mastodon vs lemmy mastodon vs owncast mastodon vs misskey mastodon vs core giscus vs gamedevmind giscus vs alive-progress giscus vs fider giscus vs guiadofrontend giscus vs guiadobackend giscus vs artalk giscus vs democracyos giscus vs human-review

More Social Networking projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Social Networking field.

glance vs Mastodon glance vs maigret glance vs Bluesky glance vs Lemmy glance vs owncast glance vs misskey glance vs core glance vs Pixelfed glance vs Infinity-For-Reddit glance vs writefreely glance vs Reddit-Enhancement-Suite glance vs praw

Frequently asked questions

Is glance or MaterialAbout more popular?

glance has 37,086 GitHub stars and MaterialAbout has 1,511. glance has the larger community by that measure.

Are glance and MaterialAbout free?

Both are open source. glance is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and MaterialAbout under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between glance and MaterialAbout?

glance is written in Go and MaterialAbout in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, glance or MaterialAbout?

Choose glance if you want the larger community (37,086 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose MaterialAbout if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.