head to head · open source

garak vs giskard-oss

garak has 9,308 GitHub stars, 1,294 forks, 429 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. giskard-oss has 5,830 stars, 537 forks, 64 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. garak leads on adoption by 60% (9,308 vs 5,830 stars). garak is written in Python under Apache-2.0; giskard-oss is written in Python under Apache-2.0. garak has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, giskard-oss 9%. giskard-oss was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (llm-evaluation, llm-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

garak ★ 9.3K giskard-oss ★ 5.8K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

garak giskard-oss
GitHub stars ★ 9.3K ★ 5.8K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 537
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick garak if

  • You weight community size — 9.3K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full garak profile →

pick giskard-oss if

  • You want the giskard-oss feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and giskard-oss fits your workflow better

full giskard-oss profile →

About garak

garak is a free, Apache 2.0 command line vulnerability scanner for large language models that probes generative AI systems for hallucination, data leakage, prompt injection, misinformation, toxicity generation, and jailbreaks, and it is aimed at security engineers, red teamers, and AI developers who need to test the models they ship.

read the full garak overview →

About giskard-oss

Giskard OSS is an open source Python library for evaluating, red teaming and testing LLM agents and RAG pipelines, built for developers, ML engineers and AI security teams that need reproducible checks on non deterministic systems.

read the full giskard-oss overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

strix vs garak strix vs giskard-oss strix vs shannon strix vs skillspector strix vs ifixai strix vs codex-security strix vs ai-infra-guard strix vs agentic-bug-hunter openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

garak vs strix garak vs shannon garak vs SkillSpector garak vs iFixAi garak vs codex-security garak vs AI-Infra-Guard garak vs Agentic-Bug-Hunter garak vs nono garak vs CyberStrike garak vs AiSOC garak vs pentest-ai-agents garak vs toolhive

Frequently asked questions

Is garak or giskard-oss more popular?

garak has 9,308 GitHub stars and giskard-oss has 5,830. garak has the larger community by that measure.

Are garak and giskard-oss free?

Both are open source. garak is licensed under Apache-2.0 and giskard-oss under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between garak and giskard-oss?

garak is written in Python and giskard-oss in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, garak or giskard-oss?

Choose garak if you want the larger community (9,308 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose giskard-oss if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.