head to head · open source
garak vs CyberStrike
garak has 9,850 GitHub stars, 1,439 forks, 429 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. CyberStrike has 3,374 stars, 583 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. garak leads on adoption by 192% (9,850 vs 3,374 stars). garak is written in Python under Apache-2.0; CyberStrike is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. garak has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, CyberStrike 17%. CyberStrike was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| garak | CyberStrike | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 9.8K | ★ 3.4K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 583 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick garak if
- You weight community size — 9.8K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick CyberStrike if
- You want the CyberStrike feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and CyberStrike fits your workflow better
About garak
garak, LLM vulnerability scanner Generative AI Red teaming & Assessment Kit garak checks if an LLM can be made to fail in a way we don't want. garak probes for hallucination, data leakage, prompt injection, misinformation, toxicity generation, jailbreaks, and many other weaknesses. If you know nmap or msf / Metasploit Framework, garak does somewhat similar things to them, but for LLMs. garak focuses on ways of making an LLM or dialog system fail. It combines static, dynamic, and adaptive probes to explore this. garak 's a free tool. We love developing it and are always interested in adding functionality to…
read the full garak overview →
About CyberStrike
English 简体中文 繁體中文 한국어 Deutsch Español Français Italiano Dansk 日本語 Polski Русский Bosanski العربية Norsk Português (Brasil) ไทย Türkçe Українська বাংলা Ελληνικά Tiếng Việt हिन्दी The first open source AI agent built for offensive security. Automated penetration testing from your terminal — plug in your Claude, GPT, or any LLM subscription and turn it into an autonomous red team agent with 13+ specialized agents, 7,600+ security skills, and 120+ OWASP test cases. 150+ AI providers • 5,300+ models • 56+ built in tools • 176+ MCP tools Quick Start • Intelligence Layer • What Makes It…
read the full CyberStrike overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is garak or CyberStrike more popular?
garak has 9,850 GitHub stars and CyberStrike has 3,374. garak has the larger community by that measure.
Are garak and CyberStrike free?
Both are open source. garak is licensed under Apache-2.0 and CyberStrike under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between garak and CyberStrike?
garak is written in Python and CyberStrike in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, garak or CyberStrike?
Choose garak if you want the larger community (9,850 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose CyberStrike if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.