head to head · open source
garak vs Agentic-Bug-Hunter
garak has 9,850 GitHub stars, 1,439 forks, 429 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Agentic-Bug-Hunter has 5,596 stars, 985 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. garak leads on adoption by 76% (9,850 vs 5,596 stars). garak is written in Python under Apache-2.0; Agentic-Bug-Hunter is written in Python under MIT. garak has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Agentic-Bug-Hunter 18%. garak was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| garak | Agentic-Bug-Hunter | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 9.8K | ★ 5.6K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 985 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick garak if
- You weight community size — 9.8K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Agentic-Bug-Hunter if
- You want the Agentic-Bug-Hunter feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Agentic-Bug-Hunter fits your workflow better
About garak
garak, LLM vulnerability scanner Generative AI Red teaming & Assessment Kit garak checks if an LLM can be made to fail in a way we don't want. garak probes for hallucination, data leakage, prompt injection, misinformation, toxicity generation, jailbreaks, and many other weaknesses. If you know nmap or msf / Metasploit Framework, garak does somewhat similar things to them, but for LLMs. garak focuses on ways of making an LLM or dialog system fail. It combines static, dynamic, and adaptive probes to explore this. garak 's a free tool. We love developing it and are always interested in adding functionality to…
read the full garak overview →
About Agentic-Bug-Hunter
AI powered bug bounty hunting recon to report, in your terminal. Free Setup · Quick Start · Commands · What It Finds · Install · Support · FAQ Built and maintained by AwareXone · Website · X · GitHub Trusted By Engineers At Where this project's stargazers say they work. Compiled from public GitHub profiles of this repository's stargazers 43 people across 30 organizations, counted from the employer each person lists on their own profile or from their public organization memberships. No individual accounts are named. These companies have not endorsed or sponsored this project; their logos are shown as trademarks…
read the full Agentic-Bug-Hunter overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is garak or Agentic-Bug-Hunter more popular?
garak has 9,850 GitHub stars and Agentic-Bug-Hunter has 5,596. garak has the larger community by that measure.
Are garak and Agentic-Bug-Hunter free?
Both are open source. garak is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Agentic-Bug-Hunter under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between garak and Agentic-Bug-Hunter?
garak is written in Python and Agentic-Bug-Hunter in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, garak or Agentic-Bug-Hunter?
Choose garak if you want the larger community (9,850 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Agentic-Bug-Hunter if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.