head to head · open source

giskard-oss vs agentic-radar

giskard-oss has 5,943 GitHub stars, 560 forks, 64 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. agentic-radar has 1,064 stars, 151 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. giskard-oss leads on adoption by 459% (5,943 vs 1,064 stars). giskard-oss is written in Python under Apache-2.0; agentic-radar is written in Python under Apache-2.0. giskard-oss has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, agentic-radar 14%. giskard-oss was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-security, llm, llm-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

giskard-oss ★ 5.9K agentic-radar ★ 1.1K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

giskard-oss agentic-radar
GitHub stars ★ 5.9K ★ 1.1K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-11-02 2025-11-27
Forks ⑂ 560 ⑂ 151
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick giskard-oss if

  • You weight community size — 5.9K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full giskard-oss profile →

pick agentic-radar if

  • You want the agentic-radar feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and agentic-radar fits your workflow better

full agentic-radar profile →

About giskard-oss

Evals, Red Teaming and Test Generation for Agentic Systems Modular, Lightweight, Dynamic and Async first Docs • Website • Community [!IMPORTANT] Giskard v3 is a fresh rewrite designed for dynamic, multi turn testing of AI agents. This release drops heavy dependencies for better efficiency while introducing a more powerful AI vulnerability scanner and enhanced RAG evaluation — both now shipping natively in giskard scan , with no dependency on v2. Only the legacy scan for tabular/ML models remains v2 only. Giskard v2 remains available but is no longer actively maintained. Follow progress → Read the v3…

read the full giskard-oss overview →

About agentic-radar

A Security Scanner for your agentic workflows! View Demo · Documentation · Report Bug · Request Feature Table of Contents Description Agentic Visualizer Getting Started Prerequisites Installation Advanced Installation CrewAI Installation OpenAI Agents Installation Usage Advanced Features Agentic Prompt Hardening Test for Vulnerabilities in Agentic Workflows CI/CD Workflow Roadmap Blogs and Tutorials Community Frequently Asked Questions Contributing Code Of Conduct License Description 📝 The Agentic Radar is designed to analyze and assess agentic systems for security and operational insights. It helps developers…

read the full agentic-radar overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

Frequently asked questions

Is giskard-oss or agentic-radar more popular?

giskard-oss has 5,943 GitHub stars and agentic-radar has 1,064. giskard-oss has the larger community by that measure.

Are giskard-oss and agentic-radar free?

Both are open source. giskard-oss is licensed under Apache-2.0 and agentic-radar under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between giskard-oss and agentic-radar?

giskard-oss is written in Python and agentic-radar in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, giskard-oss or agentic-radar?

Choose giskard-oss if you want the larger community (5,943 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose agentic-radar if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.