head to head · open source

giscus vs django-comments-xtd

giscus has 12,110 GitHub stars, 481 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. django-comments-xtd has 622 stars, 159 forks, 68 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. giscus leads on adoption by 1,847% (12,110 vs 622 stars). giscus is written in TypeScript under MIT; django-comments-xtd is written in HTML under BSD-2-Clause. giscus has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, django-comments-xtd 26%. django-comments-xtd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (comments, javascript, reactjs), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

giscus ★ 12K django-comments-xtd ★ 622 category Community & Social

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

giscus django-comments-xtd
GitHub stars ★ 12K ★ 622
License MIT BSD-2-Clause
Written in TypeScript HTML
Last push 2026-05-26 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 481 ⑂ 159
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick giscus if

  • You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full giscus profile →

pick django-comments-xtd if

  • You want the django-comments-xtd feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and django-comments-xtd fits your workflow better

full django-comments-xtd profile →

About giscus

giscus is an open source, MIT licensed commenting system powered by GitHub Discussions that lets visitors leave comments and reactions on a website through their existing GitHub accounts.

read the full giscus overview →

About django-comments-xtd

django comments xtd is a pluggable Django application that adds threaded, moderated comments to a Django project, and it is intended for Django developers and teams who want a self hosted comment system inside their own application rather than a hosted third party service.

read the full django-comments-xtd overview →

More in Community & Social

Mastodon ★ 50K maigret ★ 38K glance ★ 37K Bluesky ★ 18K Lemmy ★ 15K owncast ★ 12K

Related comparisons

giscus vs gamedevmind giscus vs alive-progress giscus vs fider giscus vs guiadofrontend giscus vs guiadobackend giscus vs artalk giscus vs democracyos giscus vs human-review mastodon vs maigret mastodon vs glance maigret vs glance mastodon vs bluesky mastodon vs lemmy mastodon vs owncast mastodon vs misskey mastodon vs core

More Collaboration & Feedback projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Feedback field.

giscus vs GameDevMind giscus vs alive-progress giscus vs Fider giscus vs guiadofrontend giscus vs guiadobackend giscus vs Artalk giscus vs democracyos giscus vs human-review giscus vs LogChimp giscus vs helios-server giscus vs Autolab giscus vs mouthful

Frequently asked questions

Is giscus or django-comments-xtd more popular?

giscus has 12,110 GitHub stars and django-comments-xtd has 622. giscus has the larger community by that measure.

Are giscus and django-comments-xtd free?

Both are open source. giscus is licensed under MIT and django-comments-xtd under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between giscus and django-comments-xtd?

giscus is written in TypeScript and django-comments-xtd in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, giscus or django-comments-xtd?

Choose giscus if you want the larger community (12,110 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose django-comments-xtd if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.