head to head · open source
Fincept Terminal vs Ghostfolio
Fincept Terminal has 33,359 GitHub stars, 4,760 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. Ghostfolio has 9,637 stars, 1,393 forks, 315 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Fincept Terminal leads on adoption by 246% (33,359 vs 9,637 stars). Fincept Terminal is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence; Ghostfolio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Fincept Terminal has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, Ghostfolio 14%. Ghostfolio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (finance, fintech), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Fincept Terminal | Ghostfolio | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 9.6K |
| License | Custom / other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | C++ | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-26 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.8K | ⑂ 1.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Fincept Terminal if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Ghostfolio if
- You want the Ghostfolio feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Ghostfolio fits your workflow better
About Fincept Terminal
[!IMPORTANT] 🔒 Fincept Terminal Enterprise — the private edition. Launch price: 90% off, ends soon. Proprietary real time data · Multi agent AI research · Live broker & algo execution · Priority support Plan Was Launch price : : : : : Exclusive $99 $10 /user/mo Exclusive+ ⭐ Most popular $199 $20 /user/mo Exclusive Pro $299 $40 /user/mo Early seats locked in at launch price for life · No annual lock in, cancel anytime · This open source repo stays free under AGPL 3.0 Fincept Terminal Your Thinking is the Only Limit. The Data Isn't. State of the art financial intelligence platform with institutional grade…
read the full Fincept Terminal overview →
About Ghostfolio
Ghostfolio Open Source Wealth Management Software Ghostfol.io Live Demo Ghostfolio Premium FAQ Blog LinkedIn Slack X Ghostfolio is an open source wealth management software built with web technology. The application empowers busy people to keep track of stocks, ETFs or cryptocurrencies and make solid, data driven investment decisions. The software is designed for personal use in continuous operation. Ghostfolio Premium Our official Ghostfolio Premium cloud offering is the easiest way to get started. Due to the time it saves, this will be the best option for most people. Revenue is used to cover operational costs…
read the full Ghostfolio overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Personal Finance Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Personal Finance Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Fincept Terminal or Ghostfolio more popular?
Fincept Terminal has 33,359 GitHub stars and Ghostfolio has 9,637. Fincept Terminal has the larger community by that measure.
Are Fincept Terminal and Ghostfolio free?
Both are open source. Fincept Terminal has no licence declared in this registry, and Ghostfolio is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Fincept Terminal and Ghostfolio?
Fincept Terminal is written in C++ and Ghostfolio in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Fincept Terminal or Ghostfolio?
Choose Fincept Terminal if you want the larger community (33,359 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Ghostfolio if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.