head to head · open source

Ghost vs nodepress

Ghost has 55,339 GitHub stars, 11,975 forks, 182 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nodepress has 1,524 stars, 308 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Ghost leads on adoption by 3,531% (55,339 vs 1,524 stars). Ghost is written in TypeScript under MIT; nodepress is written in TypeScript under MIT. Ghost has attracted 22% as many forks as stars, nodepress 20%. Ghost was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ghost ★ 55K nodepress ★ 1.5K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ghost nodepress
GitHub stars ★ 55K ★ 1.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-06-19
Forks ⑂ 12K ⑂ 308
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ghost if

  • You weight community size — 55K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ghost profile →

pick nodepress if

  • You want the nodepress feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and nodepress fits your workflow better

full nodepress profile →

About Ghost

Ghost is an open source publishing platform built in Node.js and TypeScript, designed for blogs, newsletters, and membership based content sites. It runs as a self hosted web application and also powers Ghost(Pro), a managed service where all revenue supports the Ghost Foundation. The project lives in the JavaScript/Node.js ecosystem and is licensed under MIT.

read the full Ghost overview →

About nodepress

NodePress is a TypeScript based headless content management system API service for the surmon.me blog, built with NestJS. It provides a RESTful blog API service, while the frontend, administration, native application, and AI agent are separate related projects. The project lives in the NestJS and TypeScript ecosystem, and it is released under the MIT license.

read the full nodepress overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

next-js vs ghost next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms

More Blogging & Personal Sites projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Blogging & Personal Sites field.

Ghost vs next.js Ghost vs nuxt Ghost vs gatsby Ghost vs jekyll Ghost vs hexo Ghost vs nextra Ghost vs kit Ghost vs vike Ghost vs actions-gh-pages Ghost vs react-snap Ghost vs hugo-theme-academic-cv Ghost vs docfx

Frequently asked questions

Is Ghost or nodepress more popular?

Ghost has 55,339 GitHub stars and nodepress has 1,524. Ghost has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ghost and nodepress free?

Both are open source. Ghost is licensed under MIT and nodepress under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Ghost and nodepress?

Ghost is written in TypeScript and nodepress in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ghost or nodepress?

Choose Ghost if you want the larger community (55,339 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose nodepress if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.