head to head · open source

Ghost vs kit

Ghost has 55,339 GitHub stars, 11,975 forks, 182 open issues and last shipped yesterday. kit has 9,721 stars, 2,954 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Ghost leads on adoption by 469% (55,339 vs 9,721 stars). Ghost is written in TypeScript under MIT; kit is written in HTML under MIT. Ghost has attracted 22% as many forks as stars, kit 30%. Ghost was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ghost ★ 55K kit ★ 9.7K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ghost kit
GitHub stars ★ 55K ★ 9.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript HTML
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-04
Forks ⑂ 12K ⑂ 3.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ghost if

  • You weight community size — 55K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ghost profile →

pick kit if

  • You want the kit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and kit fits your workflow better

full kit profile →

About Ghost

Ghost is an open source publishing platform built in Node.js and TypeScript, designed for blogs, newsletters, and membership based content sites. It runs as a self hosted web application and also powers Ghost(Pro), a managed service where all revenue supports the Ghost Foundation. The project lives in the JavaScript/Node.js ecosystem and is licensed under MIT.

read the full Ghost overview →

About kit

HugoBlox (listed in this registry as kit) is a free, MIT licensed static site framework that turns a plain English description into AI generated pages while keeping every page as Markdown you own, built for academics, researchers, developers, and small teams who need professional landing pages, portfolios, blogs, publications, and documentation without a database or a paid site builder.

read the full kit overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

next-js vs ghost next-js vs kit next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms

More Blogging & Personal Sites projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Blogging & Personal Sites field.

Ghost vs next.js Ghost vs nuxt Ghost vs gatsby Ghost vs jekyll Ghost vs hexo Ghost vs nextra Ghost vs vike Ghost vs actions-gh-pages Ghost vs react-snap Ghost vs hugo-theme-academic-cv Ghost vs docfx Ghost vs lektor

Frequently asked questions

Is Ghost or kit more popular?

Ghost has 55,339 GitHub stars and kit has 9,721. Ghost has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ghost and kit free?

Both are open source. Ghost is licensed under MIT and kit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Ghost and kit?

Ghost is written in TypeScript and kit in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ghost or kit?

Choose Ghost if you want the larger community (55,339 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose kit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.