head to head · open source
Ghost vs actions-gh-pages
Ghost has 55,658 GitHub stars, 12,130 forks, 182 open issues and last shipped yesterday. actions-gh-pages has 5,371 stars, 447 forks, 95 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Ghost leads on adoption by 936% (55,658 vs 5,371 stars). Ghost is written in TypeScript under MIT; actions-gh-pages is written in TypeScript under MIT. Ghost has attracted 22% as many forks as stars, actions-gh-pages 8%. Ghost was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ghost | actions-gh-pages | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 56K | ★ 5.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 12K | ⑂ 447 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ghost if
- You weight community size — 56K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick actions-gh-pages if
- You want the actions-gh-pages feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and actions-gh-pages fits your workflow better
About Ghost
Ghost.org • Forum • Docs • Contributing • Twitter [!NOTE] Love open source? We're hiring! Ghost is looking staff engineers to join the team and work with us full time The easiest way to get a production instance deployed is with our official Ghost(Pro) managed service. It takes about 2 minutes to launch a new site with worldwide CDN, backups, security and maintenance all done for you. For most people this ends up being the best value option because of how much time it saves — and 100% of revenue goes to the Ghost Foundation; funding the maintenance and further development of the project itself. So you’ll be…
read the full Ghost overview →
About actions-gh-pages
GitHub Pages Action [!NOTE] See also the GitHub official GitHub Pages Action first. GitHub Pages now uses Actions by default The GitHub Blog GitHub Pages: Custom GitHub Actions Workflows (beta) GitHub Changelog This is a GitHub Action to deploy your static files to GitHub Pages . This deploy action can be combined simply and freely with [Static Site Generators]. (Hugo, MkDocs, Gatsby, mdBook, Next, Nuxt, and so on.) [Static Site Generators]: The next example step will deploy ./public directory to the remote gh pages branch. For newbies of GitHub Actions: Note that the GITHUB TOKEN is NOT a personal access token…
read the full actions-gh-pages overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Blogging & Personal Sites projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Blogging & Personal Sites field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ghost or actions-gh-pages more popular?
Ghost has 55,658 GitHub stars and actions-gh-pages has 5,371. Ghost has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ghost and actions-gh-pages free?
Both are open source. Ghost is licensed under MIT and actions-gh-pages under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ghost and actions-gh-pages?
Ghost is written in TypeScript and actions-gh-pages in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ghost or actions-gh-pages?
Choose Ghost if you want the larger community (55,658 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose actions-gh-pages if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.