head to head · open source

Ghost vs marmite

Ghost has 55,339 GitHub stars, 11,975 forks, 182 open issues and last shipped yesterday. marmite has 875 stars, 57 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. Ghost leads on adoption by 6,224% (55,339 vs 875 stars). Ghost is written in TypeScript under MIT; marmite is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. Ghost has attracted 22% as many forks as stars, marmite 7%. Ghost was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ghost ★ 55K marmite ★ 875 category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ghost marmite
GitHub stars ★ 55K ★ 875
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-05
Forks ⑂ 12K ⑂ 57
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ghost if

  • You weight community size — 55K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ghost profile →

pick marmite if

  • You want the marmite feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and marmite fits your workflow better

full marmite profile →

About Ghost

Ghost is an open source publishing platform built in Node.js and TypeScript, designed for blogs, newsletters, and membership based content sites. It runs as a self hosted web application and also powers Ghost(Pro), a managed service where all revenue supports the Ghost Foundation. The project lives in the JavaScript/Node.js ecosystem and is licensed under MIT.

read the full Ghost overview →

About marmite

Marmite is a Rust static site generator for bloggers that turns a directory of Markdown files into a complete static HTML site with a single command, aimed at writers who want to publish chronological articles without assembling a build pipeline.

read the full marmite overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

next-js vs ghost next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms

More Blogging & Personal Sites projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Blogging & Personal Sites field.

Ghost vs next.js Ghost vs nuxt Ghost vs gatsby Ghost vs jekyll Ghost vs hexo Ghost vs nextra Ghost vs kit Ghost vs vike Ghost vs actions-gh-pages Ghost vs react-snap Ghost vs hugo-theme-academic-cv Ghost vs docfx

Frequently asked questions

Is Ghost or marmite more popular?

Ghost has 55,339 GitHub stars and marmite has 875. Ghost has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ghost and marmite free?

Both are open source. Ghost is licensed under MIT and marmite under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Ghost and marmite?

Ghost is written in TypeScript and marmite in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ghost or marmite?

Choose Ghost if you want the larger community (55,339 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose marmite if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.