head to head · open source

G6 vs kepler.gl

G6 has 12,300 GitHub stars, 1,646 forks, 333 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. kepler.gl has 12,017 stars, 1,959 forks, 452 open issues and last shipped yesterday. G6 leads on adoption by 2% (12,300 vs 12,017 stars). G6 is written in TypeScript under MIT; kepler.gl is written in TypeScript under MIT. G6 has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, kepler.gl 16%. kepler.gl was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (data-visualization, visualization), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

G6 ★ 12K kepler.gl ★ 12K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

G6 kepler.gl
GitHub stars ★ 12K ★ 12K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-07-15 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 2.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick G6 if

  • You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full G6 profile →

pick kepler.gl if

  • You want the kepler.gl feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and kepler.gl fits your workflow better

full kepler.gl profile →

About G6

G6 is a TypeScript graph visualization engine, published as @antv/g6 under the MIT licence, that provides the drawing, layout, analysis, interaction, animation, theme and plugin primitives developers need to build their own graph visualization and analysis applications.

read the full G6 overview →

About kepler.gl

Kepler.gl is an MIT licensed, TypeScript geospatial analysis tool that renders large scale geolocation data sets in the browser at million point scale, built for data analysts, GIS practitioners, and React developers who need to explore trip and point data without assembling their own rendering stack.

read the full kepler.gl overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.

G6 vs Mermaid G6 vs Apache Superset G6 vs echarts G6 vs Metabase G6 vs pixijs G6 vs diagram-design G6 vs Redash G6 vs dataease G6 vs dash G6 vs plotly.js G6 vs deck.gl G6 vs sigma.js

Frequently asked questions

Is G6 or kepler.gl more popular?

G6 has 12,300 GitHub stars and kepler.gl has 12,017. G6 has the larger community by that measure.

Are G6 and kepler.gl free?

Both are open source. G6 is licensed under MIT and kepler.gl under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between G6 and kepler.gl?

G6 is written in TypeScript and kepler.gl in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, G6 or kepler.gl?

Choose G6 if you want the larger community (12,300 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose kepler.gl if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.