head to head · open source

deck.gl vs G6

deck.gl has 14,597 GitHub stars, 2,269 forks, 532 open issues and last shipped yesterday. G6 has 12,300 stars, 1,646 forks, 333 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. deck.gl leads on adoption by 19% (14,597 vs 12,300 stars). deck.gl is written in TypeScript under MIT; G6 is written in TypeScript under MIT. deck.gl has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, G6 13%. deck.gl was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (data-visualization, visualization), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

deck.gl ★ 15K G6 ★ 12K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

deck.gl G6
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 12K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-07-15
Forks ⑂ 2.3K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick deck.gl if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full deck.gl profile →

pick G6 if

  • You want the G6 feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and G6 fits your workflow better

full G6 profile →

About deck.gl

deck.gl is an MIT licensed, WebGL2 and WebGPU powered visualization framework that renders large scale geospatial and data driven layers in the browser, built for JavaScript, TypeScript and Python developers who need high performance maps and custom visualizations without writing their own GPU rendering code.

read the full deck.gl overview →

About G6

G6 is a TypeScript graph visualization engine, published as @antv/g6 under the MIT licence, that provides the drawing, layout, analysis, interaction, animation, theme and plugin primitives developers need to build their own graph visualization and analysis applications.

read the full G6 overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.

deck.gl vs Mermaid deck.gl vs Apache Superset deck.gl vs echarts deck.gl vs Metabase deck.gl vs pixijs deck.gl vs diagram-design deck.gl vs Redash deck.gl vs dataease deck.gl vs dash deck.gl vs plotly.js deck.gl vs sigma.js deck.gl vs kepler.gl

Frequently asked questions

Is deck.gl or G6 more popular?

deck.gl has 14,597 GitHub stars and G6 has 12,300. deck.gl has the larger community by that measure.

Are deck.gl and G6 free?

Both are open source. deck.gl is licensed under MIT and G6 under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between deck.gl and G6?

deck.gl is written in TypeScript and G6 in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, deck.gl or G6?

Choose deck.gl if you want the larger community (14,597 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose G6 if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.