head to head · open source

Fizzy vs SparkleShare

Fizzy has 8,212 GitHub stars, 1,194 forks, 67 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SparkleShare has 4,979 stars, 569 forks, 69 open issues and last shipped 19 days ago. Fizzy leads on adoption by 65% (8,212 vs 4,979 stars). Fizzy is written in Ruby under a custom or non-standard licence; SparkleShare is written in C# under GPL-3.0. Fizzy has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, SparkleShare 11%. Fizzy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Fizzy ★ 8.2K SparkleShare ★ 5.0K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Fizzy SparkleShare
GitHub stars ★ 8.2K ★ 5.0K
License Custom / other GPL-3.0
Written in Ruby C#
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-01
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 569
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Fizzy if

  • You weight community size — 8.2K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Fizzy profile →

pick SparkleShare if

  • You want the SparkleShare feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and SparkleShare fits your workflow better

full SparkleShare profile →

About Fizzy

Fizzy is an open source kanban tool for tracking issues and ideas, published by 37signals as a Ruby on Rails application, and it is aimed at teams that want a fast, simple board together with the source code and the option to run that board on their own server.

read the full Fizzy overview →

About SparkleShare

SparkleShare is a free and open source file sharing and collaboration application written in C and released under the GNU GPLv3 or later, with its Sparkles library under the GNU LGPLv3 or later. It runs on Linux distributions, macOS, and Windows, and it lives in the desktop and self hosted cloud storage ecosystem alongside the Git and Git LFS tooling it depends on. The project has been on GitHub for roughly sixteen years, carries about 4,979 stars and 569 forks, and had its most recent push in September 2026.

read the full SparkleShare overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

Fizzy vs vibe-kanban Fizzy vs Wekan Fizzy vs qinglong Fizzy vs edict Fizzy vs OpenProject Fizzy vs onedev Fizzy vs Planka Fizzy vs Leantime Fizzy vs kanboard Fizzy vs Kaneo Fizzy vs ccpm Fizzy vs Backlog.md

Frequently asked questions

Is Fizzy or SparkleShare more popular?

Fizzy has 8,212 GitHub stars and SparkleShare has 4,979. Fizzy has the larger community by that measure.

Are Fizzy and SparkleShare free?

Both are open source. Fizzy has no licence declared in this registry, and SparkleShare is licensed under GPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Fizzy and SparkleShare?

Fizzy is written in Ruby and SparkleShare in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Fizzy or SparkleShare?

Choose Fizzy if you want the larger community (8,212 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose SparkleShare if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.