head to head · open source

Fizzy vs lotti

Fizzy has 8,212 GitHub stars, 1,194 forks, 67 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lotti has 1,175 stars, 119 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped today. Fizzy leads on adoption by 599% (8,212 vs 1,175 stars). Fizzy is written in Ruby under a custom or non-standard licence; lotti is written in Dart under GPL-3.0. Fizzy has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, lotti 10%. lotti was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Fizzy ★ 8.2K lotti ★ 1.2K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Fizzy lotti
GitHub stars ★ 8.2K ★ 1.2K
License Custom / other GPL-3.0
Written in Ruby Dart
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 119
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Fizzy if

  • You weight community size — 8.2K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Fizzy profile →

pick lotti if

  • You want the lotti feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You evaluated both and lotti fits your workflow better

full lotti profile →

About Fizzy

Fizzy is an open source kanban tool for tracking issues and ideas, published by 37signals as a Ruby on Rails application, and it is aimed at teams that want a fast, simple board together with the source code and the option to run that board on their own server.

read the full Fizzy overview →

About lotti

Lotti is an open source, end to end encrypted logbook for individuals who want a private, local first record of the work they actually did, staffed by persistent AI agents that read what is recorded and propose the next change for the user to approve.

read the full lotti overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

Fizzy vs vibe-kanban Fizzy vs Wekan Fizzy vs qinglong Fizzy vs edict Fizzy vs OpenProject Fizzy vs onedev Fizzy vs Planka Fizzy vs Leantime Fizzy vs kanboard Fizzy vs Kaneo Fizzy vs ccpm Fizzy vs Backlog.md

Frequently asked questions

Is Fizzy or lotti more popular?

Fizzy has 8,212 GitHub stars and lotti has 1,175. Fizzy has the larger community by that measure.

Are Fizzy and lotti free?

Both are open source. Fizzy has no licence declared in this registry, and lotti is licensed under GPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Fizzy and lotti?

Fizzy is written in Ruby and lotti in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Fizzy or lotti?

Choose Fizzy if you want the larger community (8,212 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose lotti if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.