head to head · open source
fingerprintjs vs quasar
fingerprintjs has 28,466 GitHub stars, 2,621 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. quasar has 27,210 stars, 3,674 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped yesterday. fingerprintjs leads on adoption by 5% (28,466 vs 27,210 stars). fingerprintjs is written in TypeScript under MIT; quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT. fingerprintjs has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, quasar 14%. fingerprintjs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| fingerprintjs | quasar | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 28K | ★ 27K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 3.7K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick fingerprintjs if
- You weight community size — 28K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick quasar if
- You want the quasar feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and quasar fits your workflow better
About fingerprintjs
FingerprintJS is an open source, client side browser fingerprinting library that queries browser attributes and computes a hashed visitor identifier from them, aimed at web developers and engineering teams that need to recognise returning browsers without depending on cookies or local storage.
read the full fingerprintjs overview →
About quasar
Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed Vue.js framework that builds responsive single page apps, server side rendered and statically generated sites, progressive web apps, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps, and Electron desktop apps from a single codebase.
read the full quasar overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is fingerprintjs or quasar more popular?
fingerprintjs has 28,466 GitHub stars and quasar has 27,210. fingerprintjs has the larger community by that measure.
Are fingerprintjs and quasar free?
Both are open source. fingerprintjs is licensed under MIT and quasar under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between fingerprintjs and quasar?
fingerprintjs is written in TypeScript and quasar in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, fingerprintjs or quasar?
Choose fingerprintjs if you want the larger community (28,466 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose quasar if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.