head to head · open source
fingerprintjs vs jumpcutter
fingerprintjs has 28,684 GitHub stars, 2,642 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. jumpcutter has 679 stars, 28 forks, 126 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. fingerprintjs leads on adoption by 4,124% (28,684 vs 679 stars). fingerprintjs is written in TypeScript under MIT; jumpcutter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. fingerprintjs has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, jumpcutter 4%. fingerprintjs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| fingerprintjs | jumpcutter | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 29K | ★ 679 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-10-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 28 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick fingerprintjs if
- You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick jumpcutter if
- You want the jumpcutter feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and jumpcutter fits your workflow better
About fingerprintjs
FingerprintJS is an open source, client side, browser fingerprinting library that queries browser attributes and computes a hashed visitor identifier from them. Unlike cookies and local storage, a fingerprint stays the same in incognito/private mode and even when browser data is purged. FingerprintJS is available under the MIT license. Demo Visit to see your visitor identifier. Now, try visiting the same page in private/incognito mode and notice that the visitor identifier remains the same ! Installation npm CDN Run this code Resources 📕 API Reference ⚛️ Sample usage with React on the StackBlitz platform 🔑…
read the full fingerprintjs overview →
About jumpcutter
Jump Cutter [ ][chrome web store] [ ][addons mozilla org] [ ][weblate] Download: [ ][chrome web store] [ ][addons mozilla org] [ ][microsoft edge addons] or from GitHub: Chromium / Gecko (Firefox) Skips silent parts in videos, in real time. Can be useful for watching lectures, stream recordings (VODs), webinars, podcasts, and other unedited videos. Demo: Inspired by this video by carykh. How it works Simple (mostly). Currently there are 2 separate algorithms in place. The first one we call "the stretching algorithm", and it's in this file. It simply looks at the output audio of a media element, determines its…
read the full jumpcutter overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is fingerprintjs or jumpcutter more popular?
fingerprintjs has 28,684 GitHub stars and jumpcutter has 679. fingerprintjs has the larger community by that measure.
Are fingerprintjs and jumpcutter free?
Both are open source. fingerprintjs is licensed under MIT and jumpcutter under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between fingerprintjs and jumpcutter?
fingerprintjs is written in TypeScript and jumpcutter in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, fingerprintjs or jumpcutter?
Choose fingerprintjs if you want the larger community (28,684 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose jumpcutter if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.