head to head · open source

fastapi vs easegress

fastapi has 102,402 GitHub stars, 9,903 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. easegress has 5,868 stars, 498 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. fastapi leads on adoption by 1,645% (102,402 vs 5,868 stars). fastapi is written in Python under MIT; easegress is written in Go under Apache-2.0. fastapi has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, easegress 8%. fastapi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

fastapi ★ 102K easegress ★ 5.9K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

fastapi easegress
GitHub stars ★ 102K ★ 5.9K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-07-20
Forks ⑂ 9.9K ⑂ 498
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick fastapi if

  • You weight community size — 102K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full fastapi profile →

pick easegress if

  • You want the easegress feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and easegress fits your workflow better

full easegress profile →

About fastapi

FastAPI is an MIT licensed, high performance Python web framework for building APIs with standard Python type hints, aimed at Python developers and teams that need production ready HTTP services with automatic OpenAPI documentation.

read the full fastapi overview →

About easegress

Easegress is a Cloud Native traffic orchestration system written in Go and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It is a CNCF project hosted at easegress io/easegress, with the project homepage at megaease.com/easegress. The repository is roughly five years old, carries 5,869 stars and 498 forks, and shows a last push on 2026 07 20 with 10 open issues. Its topic list places it in the Kubernetes and cloud native ecosystem alongside api gateway, gateway, load balancer, mesh, microservice, distributed systems, and etcd.

read the full easegress overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K Neovim ★ 102K Zed ★ 90K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

fastapi vs Hoppscotch fastapi vs Bruno fastapi vs Insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs OpenAPI-Specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc fastapi vs SafeLine fastapi vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF fastapi vs grpc-gateway fastapi vs Yaak fastapi vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is fastapi or easegress more popular?

fastapi has 102,402 GitHub stars and easegress has 5,868. fastapi has the larger community by that measure.

Are fastapi and easegress free?

Both are open source. fastapi is licensed under MIT and easegress under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between fastapi and easegress?

fastapi is written in Python and easegress in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, fastapi or easegress?

Choose fastapi if you want the larger community (102,402 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose easegress if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.