head to head · open source
excelize vs github-profile-views-counter
excelize has 21,036 GitHub stars, 1,984 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped yesterday. github-profile-views-counter has 5,062 stars, 429 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. excelize leads on adoption by 316% (21,036 vs 5,062 stars). excelize is written in Go under BSD-3-Clause; github-profile-views-counter is written in PHP under MIT. excelize has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, github-profile-views-counter 8%. excelize was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| excelize | github-profile-views-counter | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 5.1K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | Go | PHP |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.0K | ⑂ 429 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick excelize if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick github-profile-views-counter if
- You want the github-profile-views-counter feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You evaluated both and github-profile-views-counter fits your workflow better
About excelize
Excelize Introduction Excelize is a library written in pure Go providing a set of functions that allow you to write to and read from XLAM / XLSM / XLSX / XLTM / XLTX files. Supports reading and writing spreadsheet documents generated by Microsoft Excel™ 2007 and later. Supports complex components by high compatibility, and provided streaming API for generating or reading data from a worksheet with huge amounts of data. This library needs Go version 1.25.0 or later. The full docs can be seen using go's built in documentation tool, or online at go.dev and docs reference. Basic Usage Installation If your…
read the full excelize overview →
About github-profile-views-counter
GitHub Profile Views Counter Introduction Try [Ÿ HŸPE] service as the more robust and feature rich solution. GHPVС project is proof of concept. This counter designed to be an analytical instrument for you, but not for people who are visiting your profile. It could be used to see profile views dynamics as result of development activity, blogging or taking part in a conference. It counts how many times your GitHub profile has been viewed and displays them in your profile, for free. Usage Cloud solution launched as 100% free experience. [Help me cut server costs] if you like this service. If you want to see big…
read the full github-profile-views-counter overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.
Frequently asked questions
Is excelize or github-profile-views-counter more popular?
excelize has 21,036 GitHub stars and github-profile-views-counter has 5,062. excelize has the larger community by that measure.
Are excelize and github-profile-views-counter free?
Both are open source. excelize is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and github-profile-views-counter under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between excelize and github-profile-views-counter?
excelize is written in Go and github-profile-views-counter in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, excelize or github-profile-views-counter?
Choose excelize if you want the larger community (21,036 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose github-profile-views-counter if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.