head to head · open source

duckdb vs excelize

duckdb has 41,440 GitHub stars, 3,798 forks, 858 open issues and last shipped yesterday. excelize has 20,918 stars, 1,949 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. duckdb leads on adoption by 98% (41,440 vs 20,918 stars). duckdb is written in C++ under MIT; excelize is written in Go under BSD-3-Clause. duckdb has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, excelize 9%. duckdb was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

duckdb ★ 41K excelize ★ 21K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

duckdb excelize
GitHub stars ★ 41K ★ 21K
License MIT BSD-3-Clause
Written in C++ Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 3.8K ⑂ 1.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick duckdb if

  • You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full duckdb profile →

pick excelize if

  • You want the excelize feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and excelize fits your workflow better

full excelize profile →

About duckdb

DuckDB is an analytical, in process SQL database management system written in C++ and released under the MIT license. It runs inside the application process rather than as a separate server, and it is distributed as a standalone command line application as well as through clients for Python, R, Java, and WebAssembly. The project lives in the analytical SQL ecosystem, where the topics listed for it are analytics, database, embedded database, OLAP, and SQL. It has been developed for about eight years, with the last push recorded on 15 September 2026.

read the full duckdb overview →

About excelize

Excelize is a pure Go library for reading and writing XLAM, XLSM, XLSX, XLTM and XLTX spreadsheets, built for Go developers who need to generate or parse Microsoft Excel 2007 and later workbooks directly from their own code.

read the full excelize overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

duckdb vs krayin duckdb vs listmonk duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs billion-mail duckdb vs billionmail duckdb vs dbt plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor plane vs hrms

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

duckdb vs Krayin duckdb vs Listmonk duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs Billion Mail duckdb vs BillionMail duckdb vs dbt duckdb vs trino duckdb vs starrocks duckdb vs perspective duckdb vs Kutt duckdb vs Mautic

Frequently asked questions

Is duckdb or excelize more popular?

duckdb has 41,440 GitHub stars and excelize has 20,918. duckdb has the larger community by that measure.

Are duckdb and excelize free?

Both are open source. duckdb is licensed under MIT and excelize under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between duckdb and excelize?

duckdb is written in C++ and excelize in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, duckdb or excelize?

Choose duckdb if you want the larger community (41,440 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose excelize if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.