head to head · open source

Ente vs Peergos

Ente has 28,935 GitHub stars, 1,802 forks, 229 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Peergos has 2,519 stars, 199 forks, 103 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Ente leads on adoption by 1,049% (28,935 vs 2,519 stars). Ente is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0; Peergos is written in Java under AGPL-3.0. Ente has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Peergos 8%. Peergos was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (encryption, end-to-end-encryption), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ente ★ 29K Peergos ★ 2.5K category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ente Peergos
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 2.5K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Dart Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 199
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ente if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ente profile →

pick Peergos if

  • You want the Peergos feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Peergos fits your workflow better

full Peergos profile →

About Ente

Ente is a fully open source, end to end encrypted platform for storing photos, documents and credentials in the cloud, packaged as a monorepo of client apps and a server, and intended for people who want the features of Google Photos, Apple Photos and Authy without having to trust the service provider with their data.

read the full Ente overview →

About Peergos

Peergos is a peer to peer secure file storage system, social network, and application protocol built in Java under AGPL 3.0. It lives in the IPFS, IPLD, and libp2p ecosystem and supports a private web where users control their data, decide where it is stored, and determine who can see it. The project addresses centralized services that can track users, expose personal data, and observe relationships or file contents without cryptographic access control.

read the full Peergos overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K

Related comparisons

puter vs ente mattermost vs ente signal vs ente puter vs mattermost puter vs signal mattermost vs signal puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs vault mattermost vs vault puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade vault vs unkey mattermost vs phase puter vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat mattermost vs tracecat keycloak vs tracecat tailscale vs tracecat

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Ente vs Puter Ente vs Mattermost Ente vs Signal Ente vs Element Ente vs Fluxer Ente vs Tuta Ente vs Zen Ente vs Cinny Ente vs Stoat Ente vs Quiet Ente vs Wire Ente vs SAMA

Frequently asked questions

Is Ente or Peergos more popular?

Ente has 28,935 GitHub stars and Peergos has 2,519. Ente has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ente and Peergos free?

Both are open source. Ente is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Peergos under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Ente and Peergos?

Ente is written in Dart and Peergos in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ente or Peergos?

Choose Ente if you want the larger community (28,935 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Peergos if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.