head to head · open source

Ente vs Tuta

Ente has 28,935 GitHub stars, 1,802 forks, 229 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Tuta has 7,920 stars, 638 forks, 1,001 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Ente leads on adoption by 265% (28,935 vs 7,920 stars). Ente is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0; Tuta is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. Ente has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Tuta 8%. Tuta was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (encryption), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ente ★ 29K Tuta ★ 7.9K category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ente Tuta
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 7.9K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Dart TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 638
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ente if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ente profile →

pick Tuta if

  • You want the Tuta feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Tuta fits your workflow better

full Tuta profile →

About Ente

Ente is a fully open source, end to end encrypted platform for storing photos, documents and credentials in the cloud, packaged as a monorepo of client apps and a server, and intended for people who want the features of Google Photos, Apple Photos and Authy without having to trust the service provider with their data.

read the full Ente overview →

About Tuta

Tuta is an open source, end to end encrypted email, calendar and contacts service for individuals and teams who need private communication to work across every device they own.

read the full Tuta overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K

Related comparisons

puter vs ente mattermost vs ente signal vs ente puter vs mattermost puter vs signal mattermost vs signal puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs vault mattermost vs vault puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade vault vs unkey mattermost vs phase puter vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat mattermost vs tracecat keycloak vs tracecat tailscale vs tracecat

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Ente vs Puter Ente vs Mattermost Ente vs Signal Ente vs Element Ente vs Fluxer Ente vs Zen Ente vs Cinny Ente vs Stoat Ente vs Quiet Ente vs Wire Ente vs Peergos Ente vs SAMA

Frequently asked questions

Is Ente or Tuta more popular?

Ente has 28,935 GitHub stars and Tuta has 7,920. Ente has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ente and Tuta free?

Both are open source. Ente is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Tuta under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Ente and Tuta?

Ente is written in Dart and Tuta in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ente or Tuta?

Choose Ente if you want the larger community (28,935 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Tuta if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.