head to head · open source

Elasticsearch vs Qdrant

Elasticsearch has 77,926 GitHub stars, 26,071 forks, 6,059 open issues and last shipped today. Qdrant has 34,650 stars, 2,682 forks, 704 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Elasticsearch leads on adoption by 125% (77,926 vs 34,650 stars). Elasticsearch is written in Java under a custom or non-standard licence; Qdrant is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Elasticsearch has attracted 33% as many forks as stars, Qdrant 8%. Elasticsearch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Elasticsearch ★ 78K Qdrant ★ 35K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Elasticsearch Qdrant
GitHub stars ★ 78K ★ 35K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in Java Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 26K ⑂ 2.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Elasticsearch if

  • You weight community size — 78K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Elasticsearch profile →

pick Qdrant if

  • You want the Qdrant feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Qdrant fits your workflow better

full Qdrant profile →

About Elasticsearch

Elasticsearch is a distributed search and analytics engine built in Java, designed for near real time search, scalability, and high performance data querying on production workloads. It serves as the core storage and indexing layer of Elastic’s open stack and supports full text, structured, and vector based search.

read the full Elasticsearch overview →

About Qdrant

Qdrant is a vector similarity search engine and database built in Rust, designed for production use in AI applications. It stores, manages, and retrieves high dimensional vectors alongside associated metadata (payloads), supporting fast nearest neighbor search with filtering. It solves the problem of efficiently performing semantic or neural based matching at scale—such as finding similar images, recommending content, or powering retrieval augmented generation (RAG)—by replacing slow or inflexible brute force or index based approaches with a purpose built engine optimized for vector operations.…

read the full Qdrant overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

elasticsearch vs meilisearch elasticsearch vs clickhouse elasticsearch vs searxng elasticsearch vs typesense meilisearch vs qdrant elasticsearch vs opensearch elasticsearch vs manticore supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb meilisearch vs searxng n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana

More Search Engines projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Search Engines field.

Elasticsearch vs Meilisearch Elasticsearch vs SearXNG Elasticsearch vs Typesense Elasticsearch vs OpenSearch Elasticsearch vs Manticore Search Elasticsearch vs Quickwit Elasticsearch vs SeekStorm

Frequently asked questions

Is Elasticsearch or Qdrant more popular?

Elasticsearch has 77,926 GitHub stars and Qdrant has 34,650. Elasticsearch has the larger community by that measure.

Are Elasticsearch and Qdrant free?

Both are open source. Elasticsearch has no licence declared in this registry, and Qdrant is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Elasticsearch and Qdrant?

Elasticsearch is written in Java and Qdrant in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Elasticsearch or Qdrant?

Choose Elasticsearch if you want the larger community (77,926 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Qdrant if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.