head to head · open source
ego-lite vs peerjs
ego-lite has 21,332 GitHub stars, 1,193 forks, 169 open issues and last shipped yesterday. peerjs has 13,501 stars, 1,460 forks, 201 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. ego-lite leads on adoption by 58% (21,332 vs 13,501 stars). ego-lite is written in JavaScript under MIT; peerjs is written in TypeScript under MIT. ego-lite has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, peerjs 11%. ego-lite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ego-lite | peerjs | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 14K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-02-27 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.2K | ⑂ 1.5K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ego-lite if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick peerjs if
- You want the peerjs feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and peerjs fits your workflow better
About ego-lite
The fastest browser for AI agents to run browser automation ego (lite) is a browser where you and your AI agents work in parallel. Your agents run multiple browser tasks in their own Spaces while your tabs stay yours, and tasks complete faster on fewer tokens. Existing tools like browser use and agent browser are browser automation frameworks: they need a separate browser to drive, logins never carry cleanly, and you and the agent end up fighting for the same tabs. ego lite is one browser designed from the start for the two of you to share. No extra setup, and the agent can always reach your real logins and tabs…
read the full ego-lite overview →
About peerjs
PeerJS: Simple peer to peer with WebRTC PeerJS provides a complete, configurable, and easy to use peer to peer API built on top of WebRTC, supporting both data channels and media streams. Live Example Here's an example application that uses both media and data connections: The example also uses its own PeerServer. Special Announcement: We now have a Discord Channel There we plan to discuss roadmaps, feature requests, and more Join us today Setup Include the library with npm: npm install peerjs with yarn: yarn add peerjs Create a Peer Data connections Connect Receive Media calls Call Answer Running tests Browser…
read the full peerjs overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ego-lite or peerjs more popular?
ego-lite has 21,332 GitHub stars and peerjs has 13,501. ego-lite has the larger community by that measure.
Are ego-lite and peerjs free?
Both are open source. ego-lite is licensed under MIT and peerjs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ego-lite and peerjs?
ego-lite is written in JavaScript and peerjs in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ego-lite or peerjs?
Choose ego-lite if you want the larger community (21,332 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose peerjs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.