head to head · open source
edict vs super-board
edict has 17,017 GitHub stars, 1,767 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 29 days ago. super-board has 510 stars, 145 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. edict leads on adoption by 3,237% (17,017 vs 510 stars). edict is written in Python under MIT; super-board is written in HTML under MIT. edict has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, super-board 28%. super-board was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-agents, claude, kanban), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| edict | super-board | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 17K | ★ 510 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-09-28 | 2026-10-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.8K | ⑂ 145 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick edict if
- You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick super-board if
- You want the super-board feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and super-board fits your workflow better
About edict
⚔️ 三省六部 · Edict 我用 1300 年前的帝国制度，重新设计了 AI 多 Agent 协作架构。 结果发现，古人比现代 AI 框架更懂分权制衡。 12 个 AI Agent（11 个业务角色 + 1 个兼容角色）组成三省六部：太子分拣、中书省规划、门下省审核封驳、尚书省派发、六部+吏部并行执行。 比 CrewAI 多一层 制度性审核 ，比 AutoGen 多一个 实时看板 。 🎬 看 Demo · 🚀 30 秒体验 · 🏛️ 架构 · 📋 看板功能 · 📚 架构文档 · English · 日本語 · 参与贡献 🎬 Demo 您的浏览器不支持视频播放，请查看下方 GIF 或 下载视频 。 🎥 三省六部 AI 多 Agent 协作全流程演示 📸 GIF 预览（加载更快） 飞书下旨 → 太子分拣 → 中书省规划 → 门下省审议 → 六部并行执行 → 奏折回报（30 秒） 🐳 没有 OpenClaw？ 跑一行 docker run p 7891:7891 cft0808/edict 即可体验完整看板 Demo（预置模拟数据）。 🤔 为什么是三省六部？ 大多数 Multi Agent 框架的套路是： "来，你们几个 AI 自己聊，聊完把结果给我。" 然后你拿到一坨不知道经过了什么处理的结果，无法复现，无法审计，无法干预。 三省六部的思路完全不同 —— 我们用了一个在中国存在 1400…
read the full edict overview →
About super-board
super board Add tasks, walk away, get merged PRs with proof. 8 skills (5 you type, 3 the board runs) · 9 commands · 6 guard hooks 🌐 Live site: erictechpro.github.io/super board Install · Quick start · How it works · Skills · Commands · Guards The skill map. Click it for the live version: zoom, pan, open any node. Install In your project folder: Or as a Claude Code plugin: [!NOTE] The plugin ships the skills only. Run /super board:super board onboard and its 🔍 Checks step adds the guard hooks, scripts and workflows. Needs Claude Code, gh , jq , bash 3.2+ and Python 3.9+; the installer checks. Running from Codex…
read the full super-board overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Project & Work Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is edict or super-board more popular?
edict has 17,017 GitHub stars and super-board has 510. edict has the larger community by that measure.
Are edict and super-board free?
Both are open source. edict is licensed under MIT and super-board under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between edict and super-board?
edict is written in Python and super-board in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, edict or super-board?
Choose edict if you want the larger community (17,017 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose super-board if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.