head to head · open source

edict vs OpenProject

edict has 16,900 GitHub stars, 1,769 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. OpenProject has 16,132 stars, 3,486 forks, 224 open issues and last shipped yesterday. edict leads on adoption by 5% (16,900 vs 16,132 stars). edict is written in Python under MIT; OpenProject is written in Ruby under GPL-3.0. edict has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, OpenProject 22%. OpenProject was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (kanban), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

edict ★ 17K OpenProject ★ 16K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

edict OpenProject
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 16K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Python Ruby
Last push 2026-09-07 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 3.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick edict if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full edict profile →

pick OpenProject if

  • You want the OpenProject feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and OpenProject fits your workflow better

full OpenProject profile →

About edict

Edict is an MIT licensed Python orchestration system that runs multi agent LLM work through the Tang dynasty Three Departments and Six Ministries, splitting the job across eleven business roles plus one compatibility role so that planning, review, dispatch, and execution are handled by separate agents, and it is built for teams running OpenClaw that need every hand off between agents to be reviewable, auditable, and interruptible.

read the full edict overview →

About OpenProject

OpenProject is a web based open source project management software for teams and organizations that need transparency, flexibility, and data sovereignty. It lives in the open source project management ecosystem, with Ruby as the repository language and Angular as a listed topic. The project is positioned as an open alternative to Asana and Basecamp, and the README also compares it with Jira, MS Project, Monday, and YouTrack.

read the full OpenProject overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs planka vibe-kanban vs leantime plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

edict vs vibe-kanban edict vs Wekan edict vs qinglong edict vs onedev edict vs Planka edict vs Leantime edict vs kanboard edict vs Kaneo edict vs ccpm edict vs Fizzy edict vs Backlog.md edict vs taskwarrior

Frequently asked questions

Is edict or OpenProject more popular?

edict has 16,900 GitHub stars and OpenProject has 16,132. edict has the larger community by that measure.

Are edict and OpenProject free?

Both are open source. edict is licensed under MIT and OpenProject under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between edict and OpenProject?

edict is written in Python and OpenProject in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, edict or OpenProject?

Choose edict if you want the larger community (16,900 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OpenProject if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.