head to head · open source

edict vs epiq

edict has 16,937 GitHub stars, 1,765 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped yesterday. epiq has 501 stars, 18 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. edict leads on adoption by 3,281% (16,937 vs 501 stars). edict is written in Python under MIT; epiq is written in TypeScript under MIT. edict has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, epiq 4%. epiq was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (kanban), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

edict ★ 17K epiq ★ 501 category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

edict epiq
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 501
License MIT MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-28 2026-09-28
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 18
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick edict if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full edict profile →

pick epiq if

  • You want the epiq feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and epiq fits your workflow better

full epiq profile →

About edict

Edict is an MIT licensed Python orchestration system that runs multi agent LLM work through the Tang dynasty Three Departments and Six Ministries, splitting the job across eleven business roles plus one compatibility role so that planning, review, dispatch, and execution are handled by separate agents, and it is built for teams running OpenClaw that need every hand off between agents to be reviewable, auditable, and interruptible.

read the full edict overview →

About epiq

Epiq is a distributed, code native, self hosted issue tracker for developers and teams who want kanban style review workflows in the terminal or browser while keeping project state local, Git backed, and versioned alongside their code.

read the full epiq overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 58K Odoo ★ 55K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

vibe-kanban vs edict opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

edict vs vibe-kanban edict vs Wekan edict vs qinglong edict vs OpenProject edict vs onedev edict vs Planka edict vs Leantime edict vs kanboard edict vs Kaneo edict vs ccpm edict vs Fizzy edict vs Backlog.md

Frequently asked questions

Is edict or epiq more popular?

edict has 16,937 GitHub stars and epiq has 501. edict has the larger community by that measure.

Are edict and epiq free?

Both are open source. edict is licensed under MIT and epiq under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between edict and epiq?

edict is written in Python and epiq in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, edict or epiq?

Choose edict if you want the larger community (16,937 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose epiq if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.