head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs Douyin_TikTok_Download_API
CloakBrowser has 32,693 GitHub stars, 2,719 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Douyin_TikTok_Download_API has 21,112 stars, 2,938 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 55% (32,693 vs 21,112 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; Douyin_TikTok_Download_API is written in Python under Apache-2.0. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Douyin_TikTok_Download_API 14%. Douyin_TikTok_Download_API was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | Douyin_TikTok_Download_API | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 21K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 2.9K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Douyin_TikTok_Download_API if
- You want the Douyin_TikTok_Download_API feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Douyin_TikTok_Download_API fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About Douyin_TikTok_Download_API
Douyin TikTok Download API English 简体中文 🚀 A self hosted data API for Douyin and TikTok. One docker compose up , an identity pool that maintains itself, and a REST API, MCP server and web console on top. Open source, free, and it runs on your own machine — no signup, no quota, nobody else in the path. It fetches posts, authors, comments and search, downloads video and image albums without a watermark (it picks the clean stream the platform already publishes rather than stripping anything), and keeps what it collects in your own PostgreSQL. 💖 Sponsors These sponsors paid to be here, and Douyin TikTok Download…
read the full Douyin_TikTok_Download_API overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or Douyin_TikTok_Download_API more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,693 GitHub stars and Douyin_TikTok_Download_API has 21,112. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and Douyin_TikTok_Download_API free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and Douyin_TikTok_Download_API under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and Douyin_TikTok_Download_API?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and Douyin_TikTok_Download_API in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or Douyin_TikTok_Download_API?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,693 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Douyin_TikTok_Download_API if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.