head to head · open source

Redash vs dataease

Redash has 28,800 GitHub stars, 4,624 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. dataease has 24,442 stars, 4,236 forks, 49 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Redash leads on adoption by 18% (28,800 vs 24,442 stars). Redash is written in Python under BSD-2-Clause; dataease is written in Java under GPL-3.0. Redash has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, dataease 17%. dataease was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (business-intelligence), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Redash ★ 29K dataease ★ 24K category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Redash dataease
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 24K
License BSD-2-Clause GPL-3.0
Written in Python Java
Last push 2026-09-03 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.6K ⑂ 4.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Redash if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Redash profile →

pick dataease if

  • You want the dataease feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and dataease fits your workflow better

full dataease profile →

About Redash

Redash is an open source business intelligence and data analytics platform built with Python and JavaScript. It enables users to connect to diverse data sources, write and execute SQL/NoSQL queries, build visualizations, and share interactive dashboards—all through a browser based interface.

read the full Redash overview →

About dataease

DataEase is an open source business intelligence and data visualization tool, written in Java and licensed under GPL 3.0, built for analysts and business teams who want to explore data and build charts by clicking and dragging rather than by writing code.

read the full dataease overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io scrapling vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot apache-superset vs apache-pinot

More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.

Redash vs Mermaid Redash vs Apache Superset Redash vs echarts Redash vs Metabase Redash vs pixijs Redash vs diagram-design Redash vs dash Redash vs plotly.js Redash vs deck.gl Redash vs G6 Redash vs sigma.js Redash vs Evidence

Frequently asked questions

Is Redash or dataease more popular?

Redash has 28,800 GitHub stars and dataease has 24,442. Redash has the larger community by that measure.

Are Redash and dataease free?

Both are open source. Redash is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and dataease under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Redash and dataease?

Redash is written in Python and dataease in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Redash or dataease?

Choose Redash if you want the larger community (28,800 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose dataease if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.