head to head · open source

CryptPad vs Pdf_Tools

CryptPad has 7,930 GitHub stars, 850 forks, 401 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Pdf_Tools has 582 stars, 38 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CryptPad leads on adoption by 1,263% (7,930 vs 582 stars). CryptPad is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; Pdf_Tools is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0. CryptPad has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Pdf_Tools 7%. CryptPad was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CryptPad ★ 7.9K Pdf_Tools ★ 582 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

CryptPad Pdf_Tools
GitHub stars ★ 7.9K ★ 582
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 850 ⑂ 38
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CryptPad if

  • You weight community size — 7.9K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CryptPad profile →

pick Pdf_Tools if

  • You want the Pdf_Tools feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and Pdf_Tools fits your workflow better

full Pdf_Tools profile →

About CryptPad

CryptPad is an open source collaboration suite built around end to end encryption, written in JavaScript and released under the AGPL 3.0. It lives in the JavaScript and real time collaboration ecosystem, using ChainPad to synchronize changes to documents in real time. The suite covers documents, sheets, presentations, forms, kanban boards, code, rich text, and whiteboards, all reachable from a single CryptDrive, and it is positioned as an open alternative to Google Docs.

read the full CryptPad overview →

About Pdf_Tools

PDF Toolkit is an open source, privacy first PDF editor for Android, written in Kotlin and aimed at anyone who needs to merge, split, compress, convert, annotate, or sign PDF documents entirely on the device, with no internet connection and no account.

read the full Pdf_Tools overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs cryptpad cryptpad vs onlyoffice-docs cryptpad vs libreoffice cryptpad vs ironcalc n8n vs onlyoffice-docs n8n vs libreoffice n8n vs ironcalc n8n vs collabora-online openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Office Suites projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Office Suites field.

CryptPad vs gspread CryptPad vs ONLYOFFICE Docs CryptPad vs bento CryptPad vs LibreOffice CryptPad vs IronCalc CryptPad vs KillerPDF CryptPad vs Collabora Online CryptPad vs yft-design CryptPad vs PDF4QT CryptPad vs ZenConverter

Frequently asked questions

Is CryptPad or Pdf_Tools more popular?

CryptPad has 7,930 GitHub stars and Pdf_Tools has 582. CryptPad has the larger community by that measure.

Are CryptPad and Pdf_Tools free?

Both are open source. CryptPad is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Pdf_Tools under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CryptPad and Pdf_Tools?

CryptPad is written in JavaScript and Pdf_Tools in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CryptPad or Pdf_Tools?

Choose CryptPad if you want the larger community (7,930 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Pdf_Tools if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.