head to head · open source

crowdsec vs cve

crowdsec has 14,956 GitHub stars, 719 forks, 296 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cve has 8,091 stars, 977 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped yesterday. crowdsec leads on adoption by 85% (14,956 vs 8,091 stars). crowdsec is written in Go under MIT; cve is written in HTML under MIT. crowdsec has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, cve 12%. crowdsec was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

crowdsec ★ 15K cve ★ 8.1K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

crowdsec cve
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 8.1K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go HTML
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-24
Forks ⑂ 719 ⑂ 977
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick crowdsec if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full crowdsec profile →

pick cve if

  • You want the cve feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and cve fits your workflow better

full cve profile →

About crowdsec

CrowdSec is an open source, MIT licensed intrusion detection and prevention system, WAF and bot detection engine that analyses logs and HTTP requests and blocks malicious IPs at the firewall, reverse proxy or CDN, built for Linux, Windows, Docker and Kubernetes operators who want community sourced threat intelligence sitting behind their own infrastructure.

read the full crowdsec overview →

About cve

cve is an automatically generated, MIT licensed repository from Trickest that gathers almost every publicly available CVE Proof of Concept and publishes it as browsable markdown files, made for penetration testers, red teams and vulnerability researchers who need to find public exploits for a given identifier.

read the full cve overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

crowdsec vs PayloadsAllTheThings crowdsec vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills crowdsec vs ProjectDiscovery crowdsec vs pentagi crowdsec vs PentestGPT crowdsec vs Osintgram crowdsec vs thc-hydra crowdsec vs vuls crowdsec vs osv-scanner crowdsec vs rengine crowdsec vs reconftw crowdsec vs WhatWeb

Frequently asked questions

Is crowdsec or cve more popular?

crowdsec has 14,956 GitHub stars and cve has 8,091. crowdsec has the larger community by that measure.

Are crowdsec and cve free?

Both are open source. crowdsec is licensed under MIT and cve under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between crowdsec and cve?

crowdsec is written in Go and cve in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, crowdsec or cve?

Choose crowdsec if you want the larger community (14,956 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cve if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.