head to head · open source
ecapture vs crowdsec
ecapture has 15,490 GitHub stars, 1,647 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped yesterday. crowdsec has 15,106 stars, 729 forks, 296 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ecapture leads on adoption by 3% (15,490 vs 15,106 stars). ecapture is written in C under Apache-2.0; crowdsec is written in Go under MIT. ecapture has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, crowdsec 5%. ecapture was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ecapture | crowdsec | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 15K | ★ 15K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | C | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-07 | 2026-10-07 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.6K | ⑂ 729 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ecapture if
- You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick crowdsec if
- You want the crowdsec feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and crowdsec fits your workflow better
About ecapture
eCapture (旁观者) is an open source eBPF tool that captures SSL/TLS plaintext, database queries, and shell history on Linux and Android for security auditors, network engineers, and self hosters who need visibility into encrypted traffic without intercepting it.
read the full ecapture overview →
About crowdsec
CrowdSec is an open source, MIT licensed intrusion detection and prevention system, WAF and bot detection engine that analyses logs and HTTP requests and blocks malicious IPs at the firewall, reverse proxy or CDN, built for Linux, Windows, Docker and Kubernetes operators who want community sourced threat intelligence sitting behind their own infrastructure.
read the full crowdsec overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ecapture or crowdsec more popular?
ecapture has 15,490 GitHub stars and crowdsec has 15,106. ecapture has the larger community by that measure.
Are ecapture and crowdsec free?
Both are open source. ecapture is licensed under Apache-2.0 and crowdsec under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ecapture and crowdsec?
ecapture is written in C and crowdsec in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ecapture or crowdsec?
Choose ecapture if you want the larger community (15,490 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose crowdsec if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.