head to head · open source
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Countly
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789 GitHub stars, 464 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Countly has 5,924 stars, 986 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor leads on adoption by 48% (8,789 vs 5,924 stars). Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python under MIT; Countly is written in JavaScript under a custom or non-standard licence. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Countly 17%. Countly was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai, analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor | Countly | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.8K | ★ 5.9K |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-07-05 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 464 | ⑂ 986 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if
- You weight community size — 8.8K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Countly if
- You want the Countly feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and Countly fits your workflow better
About Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor
🎯 Claude Code Usage Monitor A privacy first Claude Usage Ops companion for Claude Code. It combines a Rich live terminal monitor with official statusline rate limits , machine readable state/export output, provenance labels, forecasting, and an opt in local usage warehouse. 📑 Table of Contents ✨ Key Features 🚀 Installation ⚡ Modern Installation with uv (Recommended) 📦 Installation with pip 🛠️ Other Package Managers 📖 Usage Get Help Basic Usage Configuration Options Available Plans 🙏 Please Help Test This Release! ✨ Features & How It Works Current Features Understanding Claude Sessions Token Limits by Plan…
read the full Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor overview →
About Countly
🔗 Quick links Countly Website Countly Server installation guide Countly SDKs, download and documentation links Countly Community on Discord User Guides for Countly features 🌟 What is Countly? Countly is a privacy first, AI ready analytics and customer engagement platform built for organizations that require full data ownership and deployment flexibility . Unlike traditional SaaS only analytics tools, Countly can be deployed on premises or in a private cloud , giving you complete control over your data, infrastructure, compliance, and security. Teams use Countly to: Understand user behavior across mobile, web…
read the full Countly overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Web & Product Analytics projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or Countly more popular?
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789 GitHub stars and Countly has 5,924. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and Countly free?
Both are open source. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is licensed under MIT, and Countly has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and Countly?
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python and Countly in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or Countly?
Choose Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if you want the larger community (8,789 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Countly if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.