head to head · open source

composio vs rea

composio has 30,473 GitHub stars, 4,847 forks, 88 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rea has 29,472 stars, 3,500 forks, 70 open issues and last shipped today. composio leads on adoption by 3% (30,473 vs 29,472 stars). composio is written in TypeScript under MIT; rea is written in TypeScript under MIT. composio has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, rea 12%. rea was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-agents, developer-tools, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

composio ★ 30K rea ★ 29K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

composio rea
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 29K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-08 2026-10-09
Forks ⑂ 4.8K ⑂ 3.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick composio if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full composio profile →

pick rea if

  • You want the rea feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and rea fits your workflow better

full rea profile →

About composio

Composio is an MIT licensed agent toolkit platform, distributed as TypeScript and Python SDKs, that gives AI agents more than 1,000 pre authenticated toolkits, per user sessions, authentication, triggers, and a sandbox for turning intent into action across real applications.

read the full composio overview →

About rea

REA is an open source MCP server and CLI that lets AI coding agents — and your terminal — reverse engineer native binaries, JavaScript and Electron apps, .NET assemblies, and websites, with evidence attached to every conclusion.

read the full rea overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 275K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

composio vs ECC composio vs react composio vs Langflow composio vs Supabase composio vs puppeteer composio vs archify composio vs PocketBase composio vs i-have-adhd composio vs codebase-memory-mcp composio vs herdr composio vs ToolJet composio vs AppSmith

Frequently asked questions

Is composio or rea more popular?

composio has 30,473 GitHub stars and rea has 29,472. composio has the larger community by that measure.

Are composio and rea free?

Both are open source. composio is licensed under MIT and rea under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between composio and rea?

composio is written in TypeScript and rea in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, composio or rea?

Choose composio if you want the larger community (30,473 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose rea if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.