head to head · open source

composio vs Graft

composio has 30,467 GitHub stars, 4,847 forks, 88 open issues and last shipped today. Graft has 9,736 stars, 883 forks, 217 open issues and last shipped today. composio leads on adoption by 213% (30,467 vs 9,736 stars). composio is written in TypeScript under MIT; Graft is written in TypeScript under MIT. composio has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, Graft 9%. Graft was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-agents, developer-tools, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

composio ★ 30K Graft ★ 9.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

composio Graft
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 9.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-08 2026-10-08
Forks ⑂ 4.8K ⑂ 883
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick composio if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full composio profile →

pick Graft if

  • You want the Graft feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Graft fits your workflow better

full Graft profile →

About composio

Composio is an MIT licensed agent toolkit platform, distributed as TypeScript and Python SDKs, that gives AI agents more than 1,000 pre authenticated toolkits, per user sessions, authentication, triggers, and a sandbox for turning intent into action across real applications.

read the full composio overview →

About Graft

Graft is an open source TypeScript CLI and MCP server that builds a readable, file based knowledge graph of your repository so coding agents such as Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and Gemini start each task already oriented instead of re exploring the code from scratch.

read the full Graft overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 275K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 156K pi ★ 113K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

composio vs ECC composio vs react composio vs Langflow composio vs Supabase composio vs puppeteer composio vs archify composio vs PocketBase composio vs i-have-adhd composio vs codebase-memory-mcp composio vs herdr composio vs ToolJet composio vs AppSmith

Frequently asked questions

Is composio or Graft more popular?

composio has 30,467 GitHub stars and Graft has 9,736. composio has the larger community by that measure.

Are composio and Graft free?

Both are open source. composio is licensed under MIT and Graft under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between composio and Graft?

composio is written in TypeScript and Graft in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, composio or Graft?

Choose composio if you want the larger community (30,467 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Graft if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.