head to head · open source
codex-security vs vuln-bank
codex-security has 11,287 GitHub stars, 903 forks, 220 open issues and last shipped yesterday. vuln-bank has 992 stars, 371 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. codex-security leads on adoption by 1,038% (11,287 vs 992 stars). codex-security is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; vuln-bank is written in HTML under MIT. codex-security has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, vuln-bank 37%. codex-security was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-security, application-security, devsecops), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| codex-security | vuln-bank | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 11K | ★ 992 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-22 |
| Forks | ⑂ 903 | ⑂ 371 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick codex-security if
- You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick vuln-bank if
- You want the vuln-bank feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and vuln-bank fits your workflow better
About codex-security
Codex Security @openai/codex security is a CLI and TypeScript SDK for defining security policy and finding, validating, and fixing security vulnerabilities in your code. 👉👉 See the Codex Security documentation for full documentation. Some cybersecurity requests and protected findings require approval through Trusted Access for Cyber. To join the program, visit chatgpt.com/cyber. Quick start Requires Node.js 22.13.0 or later and Python 3.10 or later. For CI, set OPENAI API KEY instead of signing in. Generate SECURITY.md Draft repository wide or component scoped SECURITY.md guidance for future scans: The command…
read the full codex-security overview →
About vuln-bank
Vulnerable Bank Application 🏦 A deliberately vulnerable web application for practicing application security testing of Web, APIs and LLMs, secure code review and implementing security in CI/CD pipelines. ⚠️ WARNING: This application is intentionally vulnerable and should only be used for educational purposes in isolated environments. Overview This project is a simple banking application with multiple security vulnerabilities built in. It's designed to help security engineers, developers, interns, QA analyst and DevSecOps practitioners learn about: Common web application and API vulnerabilities AI/LLM…
read the full vuln-bank overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is codex-security or vuln-bank more popular?
codex-security has 11,287 GitHub stars and vuln-bank has 992. codex-security has the larger community by that measure.
Are codex-security and vuln-bank free?
Both are open source. codex-security is licensed under Apache-2.0 and vuln-bank under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between codex-security and vuln-bank?
codex-security is written in TypeScript and vuln-bank in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, codex-security or vuln-bank?
Choose codex-security if you want the larger community (11,287 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose vuln-bank if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.