head to head · open source

codex-security vs stride-gpt

codex-security has 11,287 GitHub stars, 903 forks, 220 open issues and last shipped yesterday. stride-gpt has 1,149 stars, 337 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codex-security leads on adoption by 882% (11,287 vs 1,149 stars). codex-security is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; stride-gpt is written in Python under MIT. codex-security has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, stride-gpt 29%. codex-security was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-security, application-security, cybersecurity), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

codex-security ★ 11K stride-gpt ★ 1.1K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

codex-security stride-gpt
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 1.1K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 903 ⑂ 337
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick codex-security if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full codex-security profile →

pick stride-gpt if

  • You want the stride-gpt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and stride-gpt fits your workflow better

full stride-gpt profile →

About codex-security

Codex Security @openai/codex security is a CLI and TypeScript SDK for defining security policy and finding, validating, and fixing security vulnerabilities in your code. 👉👉 See the Codex Security documentation for full documentation. Some cybersecurity requests and protected findings require approval through Trusted Access for Cyber. To join the program, visit chatgpt.com/cyber. Quick start Requires Node.js 22.13.0 or later and Python 3.10 or later. For CI, set OPENAI API KEY instead of signing in. Generate SECURITY.md Draft repository wide or component scoped SECURITY.md guidance for future scans: The command…

read the full codex-security overview →

About stride-gpt

STRIDE GPT is an AI powered threat modelling tool that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate threat models and attack trees for a given application based on the STRIDE methodology. Users provide application details, such as the application type, authentication methods, and whether the application is internet facing or processes sensitive data. The model then generates its output based on the provided information. Table of Contents Support the Project Features Enterprise Deployment Talk at Open Security Summit Changelog Installation Repository layout Usage Interactive REPL cheat sheet Sample output…

read the full stride-gpt overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

Frequently asked questions

Is codex-security or stride-gpt more popular?

codex-security has 11,287 GitHub stars and stride-gpt has 1,149. codex-security has the larger community by that measure.

Are codex-security and stride-gpt free?

Both are open source. codex-security is licensed under Apache-2.0 and stride-gpt under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between codex-security and stride-gpt?

codex-security is written in TypeScript and stride-gpt in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, codex-security or stride-gpt?

Choose codex-security if you want the larger community (11,287 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose stride-gpt if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.