head to head · open source
codex-security vs Krawl
codex-security has 11,287 GitHub stars, 903 forks, 220 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Krawl has 825 stars, 76 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. codex-security leads on adoption by 1,268% (11,287 vs 825 stars). codex-security is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Krawl is written in Python under MIT. codex-security has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Krawl 9%. codex-security was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-security, cybersecurity), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| codex-security | Krawl | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 11K | ★ 825 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 903 | ⑂ 76 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick codex-security if
- You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Krawl if
- You want the Krawl feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Krawl fits your workflow better
About codex-security
Codex Security @openai/codex security is a CLI and TypeScript SDK for defining security policy and finding, validating, and fixing security vulnerabilities in your code. 👉👉 See the Codex Security documentation for full documentation. Some cybersecurity requests and protected findings require approval through Trusted Access for Cyber. To join the program, visit chatgpt.com/cyber. Quick start Requires Node.js 22.13.0 or later and Python 3.10 or later. For CI, set OPENAI API KEY instead of signing in. Generate SECURITY.md Draft repository wide or component scoped SECURITY.md guidance for future scans: The command…
read the full codex-security overview →
About Krawl
Krawl A modern, customizable web honeypot server designed to detect and track malicious activity from attackers and web crawlers through deceptive web pages, fake credentials, and canary tokens. Table of Contents Demo What is Krawl? Krawl Dashboard Deployment Modes Krawl Banlist Quickstart Docker Run Docker Compose Kubernetes Uvicorn (Python) Configuration config.yaml Environment Variables Ban Malicious IPs IP Reputation Running Behind a Reverse Proxy or CDN Metrics & Monitoring Additional Documentation Deception using AI Contributing Demo Tip: crawl the robots.txt paths for additional fun Krawl URL: View the…
read the full Krawl overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is codex-security or Krawl more popular?
codex-security has 11,287 GitHub stars and Krawl has 825. codex-security has the larger community by that measure.
Are codex-security and Krawl free?
Both are open source. codex-security is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Krawl under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between codex-security and Krawl?
codex-security is written in TypeScript and Krawl in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, codex-security or Krawl?
Choose codex-security if you want the larger community (11,287 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Krawl if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.