head to head · open source
codex-security vs Krawl
codex-security has 10,757 GitHub stars, 797 forks, 220 open issues and last shipped today. Krawl has 740 stars, 74 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. codex-security leads on adoption by 1,354% (10,757 vs 740 stars). codex-security is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Krawl is written in Python under MIT. codex-security has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Krawl 10%. codex-security was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-security, cybersecurity), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| codex-security | Krawl | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 11K | ★ 740 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-11 |
| Forks | ⑂ 797 | ⑂ 74 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick codex-security if
- You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Krawl if
- You want the Krawl feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Krawl fits your workflow better
About codex-security
Codex Security is OpenAI's command line tool and TypeScript SDK, published on npm as @openai/codex security , that finds, validates, and fixes security vulnerabilities in a codebase, and it serves application security engineers, DevSecOps teams, and developers who want that scanning to run from their own terminal or CI.
read the full codex-security overview →
About Krawl
Krawl A modern, customizable web honeypot server designed to detect and track malicious activity from attackers and web crawlers through deceptive web pages, fake credentials, and canary tokens. Table of Contents Demo What is Krawl? Krawl Dashboard Deployment Modes Krawl Banlist Quickstart Docker Run Docker Compose Kubernetes Uvicorn (Python) Configuration config.yaml Environment Variables Ban Malicious IPs IP Reputation Running Behind a Reverse Proxy or CDN Metrics & Monitoring Additional Documentation Deception using AI Contributing Demo Tip: crawl the robots.txt paths for additional fun Krawl URL: View the das…
read the full Krawl overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is codex-security or Krawl more popular?
codex-security has 10,757 GitHub stars and Krawl has 740. codex-security has the larger community by that measure.
Are codex-security and Krawl free?
Both are open source. codex-security is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Krawl under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between codex-security and Krawl?
codex-security is written in TypeScript and Krawl in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, codex-security or Krawl?
Choose codex-security if you want the larger community (10,757 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Krawl if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.