head to head · open source

codex-security vs agentic_security

codex-security has 11,287 GitHub stars, 903 forks, 220 open issues and last shipped yesterday. agentic_security has 2,040 stars, 300 forks, 72 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. codex-security leads on adoption by 453% (11,287 vs 2,040 stars). codex-security is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; agentic_security is written in Python under Apache-2.0. codex-security has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, agentic_security 15%. codex-security was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

codex-security ★ 11K agentic_security ★ 2.0K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

codex-security agentic_security
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 2.0K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-01
Forks ⑂ 903 ⑂ 300
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick codex-security if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full codex-security profile →

pick agentic_security if

  • You want the agentic_security feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and agentic_security fits your workflow better

full agentic_security profile →

About codex-security

Codex Security @openai/codex security is a CLI and TypeScript SDK for defining security policy and finding, validating, and fixing security vulnerabilities in your code. 👉👉 See the Codex Security documentation for full documentation. Some cybersecurity requests and protected findings require approval through Trusted Access for Cyber. To join the program, visit chatgpt.com/cyber. Quick start Requires Node.js 22.13.0 or later and Python 3.10 or later. For CI, set OPENAI API KEY instead of signing in. Generate SECURITY.md Draft repository wide or component scoped SECURITY.md guidance for future scans: The command…

read the full codex-security overview →

About agentic_security

Agentic Security An open source vulnerability scanner for Agent Workflows and Large Language Models (LLMs) Protecting AI systems from jailbreaks, fuzzing, and multimodal attacks. Explore the docs » · Report a Bug » Features Agentic Security equips you with powerful tools to safeguard LLMs against emerging threats. Here's what you can do: Multimodal Attacks 🖼️🎙️ Probe vulnerabilities across text, images, and audio inputs to ensure your LLM is robust against diverse threats. Multi Step Jailbreaks 🌀 Simulate sophisticated, iterative attack sequences to uncover weaknesses in LLM safety mechanisms. Comprehensive…

read the full agentic_security overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

Frequently asked questions

Is codex-security or agentic_security more popular?

codex-security has 11,287 GitHub stars and agentic_security has 2,040. codex-security has the larger community by that measure.

Are codex-security and agentic_security free?

Both are open source. codex-security is licensed under Apache-2.0 and agentic_security under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between codex-security and agentic_security?

codex-security is written in TypeScript and agentic_security in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, codex-security or agentic_security?

Choose codex-security if you want the larger community (11,287 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose agentic_security if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.