head to head · open source

CodeEdit vs xum

CodeEdit has 23,073 GitHub stars, 1,195 forks, 213 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. xum has 2,054 stars, 142 forks, 490 open issues and last shipped today. CodeEdit leads on adoption by 1,023% (23,073 vs 2,054 stars). CodeEdit is written in Swift under MIT; xum is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. CodeEdit has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, xum 7%. xum was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ide), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CodeEdit ★ 23K xum ★ 2.1K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CodeEdit xum
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 2.1K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Swift TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-18 2026-10-15
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 142
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CodeEdit if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CodeEdit profile →

pick xum if

  • You want the xum feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and xum fits your workflow better

full xum profile →

About CodeEdit

CodeEdit is a code editor for macOS. It is written in Swift, released under the MIT license, and described as a community project. The GitHub description says the app is open source and free forever. The project aims to provide a native editing experience for developers who work on software outside Apple platform projects.

read the full CodeEdit overview →

About xum

Xum is a desktop application and coding agent multiplexer for developers who want to run many AI coding agents in parallel across isolated workspaces, with runtimes that span a local project directory, git worktrees on the same machine, and remote execution over SSH.

read the full xum overview →

More in Developer Tools

Related comparisons

More IDEs & Code Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the IDEs & Code Editors field.

Frequently asked questions

Is CodeEdit or xum more popular?

CodeEdit has 23,073 GitHub stars and xum has 2,054. CodeEdit has the larger community by that measure.

Are CodeEdit and xum free?

Both are open source. CodeEdit is licensed under MIT and xum under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CodeEdit and xum?

CodeEdit is written in Swift and xum in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CodeEdit or xum?

Choose CodeEdit if you want the larger community (23,073 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose xum if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.