head to head · open source

Kilo vs CodeEdit

Kilo has 27,369 GitHub stars, 3,178 forks, 586 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CodeEdit has 23,034 stars, 1,191 forks, 213 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Kilo leads on adoption by 19% (27,369 vs 23,034 stars). Kilo is written in TypeScript under MIT; CodeEdit is written in Swift under MIT. Kilo has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, CodeEdit 5%. Kilo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Kilo ★ 27K CodeEdit ★ 23K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Kilo CodeEdit
GitHub stars ★ 27K ★ 23K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Swift
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-08-18
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Kilo if

  • You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Kilo profile →

pick CodeEdit if

  • You want the CodeEdit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and CodeEdit fits your workflow better

full CodeEdit profile →

About Kilo

Kilo is an open source AI coding agent platform that integrates into VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, the CLI, and cloud environments. It enables developers to build, ship, and iterate faster by acting as an autonomous or semi autonomous coding assistant across their entire workflow. Built in TypeScript and licensed under MIT, it supports 500+ models—including GPT 5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Sonnet 4.6, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview—without vendor lock in or markup.

read the full Kilo overview →

About CodeEdit

CodeEdit is a code editor for macOS. It is written in Swift, released under the MIT license, and described as a community project. The GitHub description says the app is open source and free forever. The project aims to provide a native editing experience for developers who work on software outside Apple platform projects.

read the full CodeEdit overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

react vs kilocode react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More IDEs & Code Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the IDEs & Code Editors field.

Kilo vs vscode Kilo vs Neovim Kilo vs Zed Kilo vs code-server Kilo vs helix Kilo vs vscodium Kilo vs NvChad Kilo vs opcode Kilo vs devpod Kilo vs terax-ai Kilo vs lite-xl Kilo vs react-ace

Frequently asked questions

Is Kilo or CodeEdit more popular?

Kilo has 27,369 GitHub stars and CodeEdit has 23,034. Kilo has the larger community by that measure.

Are Kilo and CodeEdit free?

Both are open source. Kilo is licensed under MIT and CodeEdit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Kilo and CodeEdit?

Kilo is written in TypeScript and CodeEdit in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Kilo or CodeEdit?

Choose Kilo if you want the larger community (27,369 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose CodeEdit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.