head to head · open source

CodeEdit vs Xed-Editor

CodeEdit has 23,034 GitHub stars, 1,191 forks, 213 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Xed-Editor has 2,311 stars, 159 forks, 80 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CodeEdit leads on adoption by 897% (23,034 vs 2,311 stars). CodeEdit is written in Swift under MIT; Xed-Editor is written in Kotlin under GPL-3.0. CodeEdit has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Xed-Editor 7%. Xed-Editor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (code, code-editor), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CodeEdit ★ 23K Xed-Editor ★ 2.3K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CodeEdit Xed-Editor
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 2.3K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Swift Kotlin
Last push 2026-08-18 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 159
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CodeEdit if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CodeEdit profile →

pick Xed-Editor if

  • You want the Xed-Editor feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and Xed-Editor fits your workflow better

full Xed-Editor profile →

About CodeEdit

CodeEdit is a code editor for macOS. It is written in Swift, released under the MIT license, and described as a community project. The GitHub description says the app is open source and free forever. The project aims to provide a native editing experience for developers who work on software outside Apple platform projects.

read the full CodeEdit overview →

About Xed-Editor

Xed Editor is a free, GPL 3.0 licensed text and code editor for Android, written in Kotlin, built for developers and power users who want syntax highlighting, LSP powered code intelligence, a built in terminal, and extensions on a phone or tablet.

read the full Xed-Editor overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More IDEs & Code Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the IDEs & Code Editors field.

CodeEdit vs vscode CodeEdit vs Neovim CodeEdit vs Zed CodeEdit vs code-server CodeEdit vs helix CodeEdit vs vscodium CodeEdit vs NvChad CodeEdit vs Kilo CodeEdit vs opcode CodeEdit vs devpod CodeEdit vs terax-ai CodeEdit vs lite-xl

Frequently asked questions

Is CodeEdit or Xed-Editor more popular?

CodeEdit has 23,034 GitHub stars and Xed-Editor has 2,311. CodeEdit has the larger community by that measure.

Are CodeEdit and Xed-Editor free?

Both are open source. CodeEdit is licensed under MIT and Xed-Editor under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CodeEdit and Xed-Editor?

CodeEdit is written in Swift and Xed-Editor in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CodeEdit or Xed-Editor?

Choose CodeEdit if you want the larger community (23,034 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Xed-Editor if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.