head to head · open source

CodeEdit vs ORG2

CodeEdit has 23,062 GitHub stars, 1,192 forks, 213 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. ORG2 has 2,627 stars, 125 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. CodeEdit leads on adoption by 778% (23,062 vs 2,627 stars). CodeEdit is written in Swift under MIT; ORG2 is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. CodeEdit has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, ORG2 5%. ORG2 was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ide), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CodeEdit ★ 23K ORG2 ★ 2.6K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CodeEdit ORG2
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 2.6K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Swift TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-18 2026-10-04
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 125
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CodeEdit if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CodeEdit profile →

pick ORG2 if

  • You want the ORG2 feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and ORG2 fits your workflow better

full ORG2 profile →

About CodeEdit

CodeEdit is a code editor for macOS. It is written in Swift, released under the MIT license, and described as a community project. The GitHub description says the app is open source and free forever. The project aims to provide a native editing experience for developers who work on software outside Apple platform projects.

read the full CodeEdit overview →

About ORG2

ORG 2 is a local first desktop harness that runs coding agents and turns every session into a replayable trajectory, so a team can trace any shipped line of code back to the decision that produced it.

read the full ORG2 overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 274K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 156K pi ★ 113K

Related comparisons

react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More IDEs & Code Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the IDEs & Code Editors field.

CodeEdit vs vscode CodeEdit vs Neovim CodeEdit vs Zed CodeEdit vs code-server CodeEdit vs helix CodeEdit vs vscodium CodeEdit vs NvChad CodeEdit vs Kilo CodeEdit vs opcode CodeEdit vs devpod CodeEdit vs platformio-core CodeEdit vs spyder

Frequently asked questions

Is CodeEdit or ORG2 more popular?

CodeEdit has 23,062 GitHub stars and ORG2 has 2,627. CodeEdit has the larger community by that measure.

Are CodeEdit and ORG2 free?

Both are open source. CodeEdit is licensed under MIT and ORG2 under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CodeEdit and ORG2?

CodeEdit is written in Swift and ORG2 in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CodeEdit or ORG2?

Choose CodeEdit if you want the larger community (23,062 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ORG2 if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.