head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs socid-extractor
CloakBrowser has 32,693 GitHub stars, 2,719 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. socid-extractor has 1,134 stars, 127 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 2,783% (32,693 vs 1,134 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; socid-extractor is written in Python under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, socid-extractor 11%. CloakBrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | socid-extractor | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 127 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick socid-extractor if
- You want the socid-extractor feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and socid-extractor fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About socid-extractor
socid extractor Turn any public profile page into a structured account record — usernames, display names, bios, avatars, locations, joined at dates, follower counts, external links, and the stable internal identifiers that uniquely pin an account across renames, redesigns, and deletions. socid extractor parses HTML pages and API responses from 250+ schemes and returns a flat, machine readable dictionary of account fields. No API keys required, no headless browser — just a single function call on response text. Why it's useful Stable cross service IDs. Get GAIA ID (Google), Facebook UID, Yandex Public ID…
read the full socid-extractor overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or socid-extractor more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,693 GitHub stars and socid-extractor has 1,134. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and socid-extractor free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and socid-extractor under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and socid-extractor?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and socid-extractor in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or socid-extractor?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,693 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose socid-extractor if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.