head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs skills
CloakBrowser has 32,712 GitHub stars, 2,720 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. skills has 6,314 stars, 342 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 418% (32,712 vs 6,314 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; skills is written in Python under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, skills 5%. skills was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | skills | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 6.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 342 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick skills if
- You want the skills feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and skills fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About skills
What can BrowserAct be used for? BrowserAct enables AI agents and teams to perform real browser automation, web data extraction, and account based workflows. It helps agents get past anti bot walls, hand off to humans across platforms when stuck, run parallel tasks without cross contamination, and isolate multiple accounts in independent browsers, backed by stealth fingerprints, TLS rotation, residential proxies, CAPTCHA solving, and stable fingerprint proxy setups for authenticated sessions. Two usage modes are available: fully cloud managed execution, or local browser control driven by your own agent workflow…
read the full skills overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or skills more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,712 GitHub stars and skills has 6,314. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and skills free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and skills under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and skills?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and skills in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or skills?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,712 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose skills if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.