head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs scrapecraft
CloakBrowser has 31,528 GitHub stars, 2,612 forks, 224 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. scrapecraft has 698 stars, 112 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 4,417% (31,528 vs 698 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; scrapecraft is written in Python under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, scrapecraft 16%. CloakBrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | scrapecraft | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 698 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-13 | 2025-12-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 112 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick scrapecraft if
- You want the scrapecraft feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and scrapecraft fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
CloakBrowser is a stealth Chromium build for Python and JavaScript teams that need browser automation to survive bot detection systems, aimed at scraping and AI agent engineers who want to replace Playwright or Puppeteer without rewriting their code.
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About scrapecraft
ScrapeCraft is an MIT licensed, web based scraping editor — described in its README as similar to Cursor but specialized for web scraping — that lets users build, test, and deploy scrapers through a visual workflow builder and natural language AI assistance, and it is aimed at developers and data teams who already work in Python or TypeScript and want extraction pipelines assembled rather than hand coded.
read the full scrapecraft overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or scrapecraft more popular?
CloakBrowser has 31,528 GitHub stars and scrapecraft has 698. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and scrapecraft free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and scrapecraft under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and scrapecraft?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and scrapecraft in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or scrapecraft?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (31,528 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose scrapecraft if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.