head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs scrapecraft
CloakBrowser has 32,693 GitHub stars, 2,719 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. scrapecraft has 724 stars, 116 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 4,416% (32,693 vs 724 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; scrapecraft is written in Python under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, scrapecraft 16%. CloakBrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | scrapecraft | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 724 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2025-12-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 116 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick scrapecraft if
- You want the scrapecraft feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and scrapecraft fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About scrapecraft
ScrapeCraft AI Powered Web Scraping Editor ScrapeCraft is a web based scraping editor similar to Cursor but specialized for web scraping. It uses AI assistance to help users build scraping pipelines with the ScrapeGraphAI API. Features 🤖 AI powered assistant using OpenRouter (Kimi k2 model) 🔗 Multi URL bulk scraping support 📋 Dynamic schema definition with Pydantic 💻 Python code generation with async support 🚀 Real time WebSocket streaming 📊 Results visualization (table & JSON views) 🔄 Auto updating deployment with Watchtower Tech Stack Backend : FastAPI, LangGraph, ScrapeGraphAI Frontend : React…
read the full scrapecraft overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or scrapecraft more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,693 GitHub stars and scrapecraft has 724. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and scrapecraft free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and scrapecraft under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and scrapecraft?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and scrapecraft in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or scrapecraft?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,693 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose scrapecraft if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.