head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs rebrowser-patches
CloakBrowser has 32,329 GitHub stars, 2,867 forks, 156 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. rebrowser-patches has 1,443 stars, 85 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 2,140% (32,329 vs 1,443 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; rebrowser-patches is written in JavaScript under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, rebrowser-patches 6%. rebrowser-patches was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (bot-detection, cloudflare, playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | rebrowser-patches | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 85 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick rebrowser-patches if
- You want the rebrowser-patches feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and rebrowser-patches fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About rebrowser-patches
🪄 Patches for undetectable browser automation This repo contains patches to enhance popular web automation libraries. Specifically, it targets the puppeteer and playwright packages. Some aspects of automation libraries or browser behavior cannot be adjusted through settings or command line switches. Therefore, we fix these issues by patching the library's source code. While this approach is fragile and may break as the libraries' source code changes over time, the goal is to maintain this repo with community help to keep the patches up to date. Do I really need any patches? Out of the box Puppeteer and…
read the full rebrowser-patches overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or rebrowser-patches more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,329 GitHub stars and rebrowser-patches has 1,443. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and rebrowser-patches free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and rebrowser-patches under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and rebrowser-patches?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and rebrowser-patches in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or rebrowser-patches?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,329 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose rebrowser-patches if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.