head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs OpenAdapt
CloakBrowser has 32,329 GitHub stars, 2,867 forks, 156 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. OpenAdapt has 1,784 stars, 266 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped today. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 1,712% (32,329 vs 1,784 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; OpenAdapt is written in Python under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, OpenAdapt 15%. OpenAdapt was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | OpenAdapt | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 1.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 266 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick OpenAdapt if
- You want the OpenAdapt feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and OpenAdapt fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About OpenAdapt
OpenAdapt Give your agent a program, not a mouse. The open source, verified execution layer for computer use agents. What it can do · Documentation · Quickstart · Live demo · Website · Discord A computer use agent looks at the screen and chooses every click again, on every run. OpenAdapt lets your agent, or a person, do a task once in any app: web, Windows, macOS, Linux, RDP or Citrix. It compiles that run into a program, and your agent calls the program as one tool. The program runs with no model calls and sends no screenshots anywhere. It confirms the right record before each save, reads the save back from the…
read the full OpenAdapt overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or OpenAdapt more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,329 GitHub stars and OpenAdapt has 1,784. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and OpenAdapt free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and OpenAdapt under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and OpenAdapt?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and OpenAdapt in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or OpenAdapt?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,329 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OpenAdapt if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.